2022-04-16 00:12:26

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 13/27] block: add a bdev_fua helper

Add a helper to check the FUA flag based on the block_device instead of
having to poke into the block layer internal request_queue.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 3 +--
drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 3 +--
fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 3 +--
include/linux/blkdev.h | 6 +++++-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
index f8cc3c5fecb4b..beaef43a67b9d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
@@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp,
struct rnbd_srv_sess_dev *sess_dev)
{
struct rnbd_dev *rnbd_dev = sess_dev->rnbd_dev;
- struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(rnbd_dev->bdev);

rsp->hdr.type = cpu_to_le16(RNBD_MSG_OPEN_RSP);
rsp->device_id =
@@ -560,7 +559,7 @@ static void rnbd_srv_fill_msg_open_rsp(struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp,
rsp->cache_policy = 0;
if (bdev_write_cache(rnbd_dev->bdev))
rsp->cache_policy |= RNBD_WRITEBACK;
- if (blk_queue_fua(q))
+ if (bdev_fua(rnbd_dev->bdev))
rsp->cache_policy |= RNBD_FUA;
}

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
index 03013e85ffc03..c4a903b8a47fc 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
@@ -727,14 +727,13 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist *sgl, u32 sgl_nents,

if (data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
struct iblock_dev *ib_dev = IBLOCK_DEV(dev);
- struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(ib_dev->ibd_bd);
/*
* Force writethrough using REQ_FUA if a volatile write cache
* is not enabled, or if initiator set the Force Unit Access bit.
*/
opf = REQ_OP_WRITE;
miter_dir = SG_MITER_TO_SG;
- if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &q->queue_flags)) {
+ if (bdev_fua(ib_dev->ibd_bd)) {
if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_FUA)
opf |= REQ_FUA;
else if (!bdev_write_cache(ib_dev->ibd_bd))
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
index b08f5dc31780d..62da020d02a11 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -265,8 +265,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
* cache flushes on IO completion.
*/
if (!(iomap->flags & (IOMAP_F_SHARED|IOMAP_F_DIRTY)) &&
- (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA) &&
- blk_queue_fua(bdev_get_queue(iomap->bdev)))
+ (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA) && bdev_fua(iomap->bdev))
use_fua = true;
}

diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 807a49aa5a27a..075b16d4560e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -602,7 +602,6 @@ bool blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER))
#define blk_queue_quiesced(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, &(q)->queue_flags)
#define blk_queue_pm_only(q) atomic_read(&(q)->pm_only)
-#define blk_queue_fua(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &(q)->queue_flags)
#define blk_queue_registered(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &(q)->queue_flags)
#define blk_queue_nowait(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, &(q)->queue_flags)

@@ -1336,6 +1335,11 @@ static inline bool bdev_write_cache(struct block_device *bdev)
return test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_WC, &bdev_get_queue(bdev)->queue_flags);
}

+static inline bool bdev_fua(struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+ return test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &bdev_get_queue(bdev)->queue_flags);
+}
+
static inline enum blk_zoned_model bdev_zoned_model(struct block_device *bdev)
{
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
--
2.30.2


2022-04-16 02:24:36

by Chaitanya Kulkarni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/27] block: add a bdev_fua helper

On 4/14/22 21:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add a helper to check the FUA flag based on the block_device instead of
> having to poke into the block layer internal request_queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>

-ck