2019-03-28 09:18:21

by Jiufei Xue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] jbd2: check superblock mapped prior to committing

We hit a BUG at fs/buffer.c:3057 if we detached the nbd device
before unmounting ext4 filesystem.

The typical chain of events leading to the BUG:
jbd2_write_superblock
submit_bh
submit_bh_wbc
BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));

The block device is removed and all the pages are invalidated. JBD2
was trying to write journal superblock to the block device which is
no longer present.

Fix this by checking the journal superblock's buffer head prior to
submitting.

Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Eric Ren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <[email protected]>
---
fs/jbd2/journal.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 382c030cc78b..90fd3ed0a232 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -1350,6 +1350,9 @@ static int jbd2_write_superblock(journal_t *journal, int write_flags)
journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
int ret;

+ if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
+ return -EIO;
+
trace_jbd2_write_superblock(journal, write_flags);
if (!(journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER))
write_flags &= ~(REQ_FUA | REQ_PREFLUSH);
--
2.19.1.856.g8858448bb



2019-03-28 10:00:00

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: check superblock mapped prior to committing

On Thu 28-03-19 17:18:14, Jiufei Xue wrote:
> We hit a BUG at fs/buffer.c:3057 if we detached the nbd device
> before unmounting ext4 filesystem.
>
> The typical chain of events leading to the BUG:
> jbd2_write_superblock
> submit_bh
> submit_bh_wbc
> BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
>
> The block device is removed and all the pages are invalidated. JBD2
> was trying to write journal superblock to the block device which is
> no longer present.
>
> Fix this by checking the journal superblock's buffer head prior to
> submitting.
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Reported-by: Eric Ren <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 382c030cc78b..90fd3ed0a232 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1350,6 +1350,9 @@ static int jbd2_write_superblock(journal_t *journal, int write_flags)
> journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
> int ret;
>
Can you add a comment here like:

/* Buffer got discarded which means block device got invalidated */

to explain what's going on? Thanks! Otherwise the patch looks good to me so
you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

Honza

> + if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
> + return -EIO;
> +


> trace_jbd2_write_superblock(journal, write_flags);
> if (!(journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER))
> write_flags &= ~(REQ_FUA | REQ_PREFLUSH);
> --
> 2.19.1.856.g8858448bb
>
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

2019-03-28 10:05:33

by Jiufei Xue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: check superblock mapped prior to committing

Hi Jan,

On 2019/3/28 下午5:59, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 28-03-19 17:18:14, Jiufei Xue wrote:
>> We hit a BUG at fs/buffer.c:3057 if we detached the nbd device
>> before unmounting ext4 filesystem.
>>
>> The typical chain of events leading to the BUG:
>> jbd2_write_superblock
>> submit_bh
>> submit_bh_wbc
>> BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
>>
>> The block device is removed and all the pages are invalidated. JBD2
>> was trying to write journal superblock to the block device which is
>> no longer present.
>>
>> Fix this by checking the journal superblock's buffer head prior to
>> submitting.
>>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Reported-by: Eric Ren <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index 382c030cc78b..90fd3ed0a232 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -1350,6 +1350,9 @@ static int jbd2_write_superblock(journal_t *journal, int write_flags)
>> journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
>> int ret;
>>
> Can you add a comment here like:
>
> /* Buffer got discarded which means block device got invalidated */
>
> to explain what's going on? Thanks! Otherwise the patch looks good to me so
> you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
>


Thank you for your suggestion, I will add the comment and send version 2 soon.

Thanks,
Jiufei

> Honza
>
>> + if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>
>
>> trace_jbd2_write_superblock(journal, write_flags);
>> if (!(journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER))
>> write_flags &= ~(REQ_FUA | REQ_PREFLUSH);
>> --
>> 2.19.1.856.g8858448bb
>>