2023-09-19 13:07:25

by Kemeng Shi

Subject: [PATCH v7 03/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple

call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple to:
1. remove repeat code
2. pair update of free_clusters in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple.
3. add missing ext4_lock_group/ext4_unlock_group protection.

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <[email protected]>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 33 +--------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index e1320eea46e9..cd2fd5dbfcdd 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -6393,43 +6393,12 @@ ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
static void ext4_free_blocks_simple(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t block,
unsigned long count)
{
- struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh;
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
- struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
- struct buffer_head *gdp_bh;
ext4_group_t group;
ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
- int already_freed = 0, err, i;

ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, &blkoff);
- bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, group);
- if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
- pr_warn("Failed to read block bitmap\n");
- return;
- }
- gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, group, &gdp_bh);
- if (!gdp)
- goto err_out;
-
- for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data))
- already_freed++;
- }
- mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, blkoff, count);
- err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, bitmap_bh);
- if (err)
- goto err_out;
- ext4_free_group_clusters_set(
- sb, gdp, ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) +
- count - already_freed);
- ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, gdp, bitmap_bh);
- ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, group, gdp);
- ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(NULL, NULL, gdp_bh);
- sync_dirty_buffer(bitmap_bh);
- sync_dirty_buffer(gdp_bh);
-
-err_out:
- brelse(bitmap_bh);
+ ext4_mb_mark_context(sb, false, group, blkoff, count);
}

/**
--
2.30.0

2023-09-27 15:41:54

by Ritesh Harjani (IBM)

Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple

Kemeng Shi <[email protected]> writes:

> call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple to:
> 1. remove repeat code
> 2. pair update of free_clusters in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple.
> 3. add missing ext4_lock_group/ext4_unlock_group protection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 33 +--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index e1320eea46e9..cd2fd5dbfcdd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -6393,43 +6393,12 @@ ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
> static void ext4_free_blocks_simple(struct inode *inode, ext4_fsblk_t block,
> unsigned long count)

This might need some auditing later (need not be as part of this series)
on why it is an unsigned long. I think it is just a left over and an
unsigned int should be sufficient.

But either ways this patch looks good to me. Feel free to add -

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>

-ritesh