For two unsigned values the check "block+count < block" is always
false. Thus the below patch removes that condition.
=============================================================
Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <[email protected]>
--- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-05-11 23:54:40.000000000 +0530
+++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-06-01 00:03:44.000000000 +0530
@@ -499,7 +499,6 @@
unsigned freed = 0, group_freed;
if (block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
- block + count < block ||
block + count > le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
ext2_error (sb, "ext2_free_blocks",
"Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
=============================================================
--
Thanks & Regards,
********************************************
Manish Katiyar ( http://mkatiyar.googlepages.com )
3rd Floor, Fair Winds Block
EGL Software Park
Off Intermediate Ring Road
Bangalore 560071, India
***********************************************
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Manish Katiyar <[email protected]> wrote:
> For two unsigned values the check "block+count < block" is always
> false. Thus the below patch removes that condition.
>
Always? What about "ULONG_MAX + 5"? I believe the answer is 4, but I
may be wrong. You might want to rethink this one.
RE/
Mark
> =============================================================
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <[email protected]>
>
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-05-11 23:54:40.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-06-01 00:03:44.000000000 +0530
> @@ -499,7 +499,6 @@
> unsigned freed = 0, group_freed;
>
> if (block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
> - block + count < block ||
> block + count > le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
> ext2_error (sb, "ext2_free_blocks",
> "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
>
>
> =============================================================
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> ********************************************
> Manish Katiyar ( http://mkatiyar.googlepages.com )
> 3rd Floor, Fair Winds Block
> EGL Software Park
> Off Intermediate Ring Road
> Bangalore 560071, India
> ***********************************************
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Mark Asselstine <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Manish Katiyar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> For two unsigned values the check "block+count < block" is always
>> false. Thus the below patch removes that condition.
>>
> Always? What about "ULONG_MAX + 5"? I believe the answer is 4, but I
> may be wrong. You might want to rethink this one.
Yeah.... it is a total crap patch .... sorry for making the noise.
>
> RE/
> Mark
>
>> =============================================================
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <[email protected]>
>>
>> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-05-11 23:54:40.000000000 +0530
>> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c 2008-06-01 00:03:44.000000000 +0530
>> @@ -499,7 +499,6 @@
>> unsigned freed = 0, group_freed;
>>
>> if (block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
>> - block + count < block ||
>> block + count > le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
>> ext2_error (sb, "ext2_free_blocks",
>> "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
>>
>>
>> =============================================================
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> ********************************************
>> Manish Katiyar ( http://mkatiyar.googlepages.com )
>> 3rd Floor, Fair Winds Block
>> EGL Software Park
>> Off Intermediate Ring Road
>> Bangalore 560071, India
>> ***********************************************
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to [email protected]
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
********************************************
Manish Katiyar ( http://mkatiyar.googlepages.com )
3rd Floor, Fair Winds Block
EGL Software Park
Off Intermediate Ring Road
Bangalore 560071, India
***********************************************