I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
It can be downloaded from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=14
or
http://www.{countrycode}.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/nfs/
This release adds some statd fixes and a couple of other small bug fixes,
and also gets ./configure to complain if libnfsidmap or libevent aren't installed
(unless --disable-nfsv4 is selected).
README also says where to get these libraries from.
I still hope to put this out as a final 1.0.7 before Christmas.
Having lots of people say "Yes, I've tried it, and it works OK" would
make a great Christmas present :-)
NeilBrown 10-December-2004
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
Neil Brown wrote:
> I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
> I still hope to put this out as a final 1.0.7 before Christmas.
> Having lots of people say "Yes, I've tried it, and it works OK" would
> make a great Christmas present :-)
"Yes, I've tried it, and it works OK"... :)
Seriously though, I did test the HA callout stuff and it, as well as
everything else, looks good.
Thanks,
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
Neil,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:50:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
Any chance that you include our autotools patch in this release? Or is
it too intrusive? In this case I would be interested in some further
feedback.
Cheers,
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hornemannstra?e 12, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:10:43PM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:50:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
>
> Any chance that you include our autotools patch in this release? Or is
> it too intrusive? In this case I would be interested in some further
> feedback.
It looks like a large patch. Neil seems to want to get 1.0.7 out in the
next few days.
I'd be happy to take the patch, include it in the citi nfs-utils patch
series for a while, then push it to Neil after 1.0.7. That way I'd get
the chance to make any necessary fixes for nfsv4/gss before it went in.
Does that sound OK?
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:37:10PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> It looks like a large patch. Neil seems to want to get 1.0.7 out in the
> next few days.
>
> I'd be happy to take the patch, include it in the citi nfs-utils patch
> series for a while, then push it to Neil after 1.0.7. That way I'd get
> the chance to make any necessary fixes for nfsv4/gss before it went in.
> Does that sound OK?
Ok! I'll send a new patch ported to pre2.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hornemannstra?e 12, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:50:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
Neil, would you be interested in including mount.nfs in this release of
nfs-utils? It's some 90% done for NFSv2/v3, and I could make the push
to 99% if you tell me you will include it.
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | Things that make Monday morning interesting, #2:
[email protected] | "We have 8,000 NFS mount points, why do we keep
---------------+ running out of privileged ports?"
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Friday December 10, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:50:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> > I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
>
> Neil, would you be interested in including mount.nfs in this release of
> nfs-utils? It's some 90% done for NFSv2/v3, and I could make the push
> to 99% if you tell me you will include it.
In principle, I'm happy to include it.
I'd really like to release 1.0.7 on Friday 17th if at all possible.
How about you send me what you have now, and send the remaining 9% :-)
when it's ready. That way I'll already be familiar with the details
and including the final version should be reasonably smooth.
NeilBrown
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Friday 10 December 2004 02:50, Neil Brown wrote:
> I have made available a second pre-release of nfs-utils 1.0.7.
>
> It can be downloaded from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D14
> or
> http://www.{countrycode}.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/nfs/
>
> This release adds some statd fixes and a couple of other small bug fixes,
> and also gets ./configure to complain if libnfsidmap or libevent aren't
> installed (unless --disable-nfsv4 is selected).
> README also says where to get these libraries from.
Well, it still complains with --disable-nfsv4:
svcgssd_proc.c:47:22: nfsidmap.h: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [dep] Error 1
make[3]: *** [dep] Error 2
make[2]: *** [dep] Error 2
Should the configure script assume '--disable-gss' when --disable-nfsv4 is=
=20
given?=20
>
> I still hope to put this out as a final 1.0.7 before Christmas.
> Having lots of people say "Yes, I've tried it, and it works OK" would
> make a great Christmas present :-)
>
Well, with --disable-nfsv4 --disable-gss and without '--enable-secure-statd=
'=20
the statd seems to work fine. As I posted a very long time ago, we are seei=
ng=20
messages like this
lockd: cannot monitor 129.206.21.200
lockd: failed to monitor 129.206.21.200
statd: server localhost not responding, timed out
nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=3D-5
lockd: cannot monitor 129.206.21.200
lockd: failed to monitor 129.206.21.200
very often if '--enable-secure-statd' is enabled. This also causes much=20
trouble to other services as portmap, ssh, nis, cron, etc. and makes them=20
also crash (not so good as we can't reboot the systems).
Unfortunately this also happens randomly to one/some of our clients rather=
=20
often since we switched to a new server in summer, don't know the reasons=20
yet.
I will now try to enable secure-statd, compiling with debug options and hop=
e=20
the statd core files will help to understand the problem. Though, maybe tho=
se=20
problems are already fixed?
Cheers,
Bernd
=2D-=20
Bernd Schubert
Physikalisch Chemisches Institut / Theoretische Chemie
Universit=E4t Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
e-mail: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Should the configure script assume '--disable-gss' when --disable-nfsv4 is
> given?
It's possible someone could want gss but not nfsv4; the two are
independent, since gss works for all nfs versions.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:14:15AM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:37:10PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > It looks like a large patch. Neil seems to want to get 1.0.7 out in the
> > next few days.
> >
> > I'd be happy to take the patch, include it in the citi nfs-utils patch
> > series for a while, then push it to Neil after 1.0.7. That way I'd get
> > the chance to make any necessary fixes for nfsv4/gss before it went in.
> > Does that sound OK?
>
> Ok! I'll send a new patch ported to pre2.
... Or 1.0.7, I assume. Also, when you do that, could you separate out
the changes that are just automatically generated by automake and such?
So then there'll be two patches, which apply in order, the first with
the changes you made, the second with the automatically generated stuff.
(And if you could include a comment with the second patch explaining
what you ran, e.g., "aclocal && automake --add-missing", that'd help
too.)
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs