Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> Note for instance that the error NFS3ERR_JUKEBOX is not listed as a
> return value for any of the procedures: I'm sure that it would come as a
> surprise to most server implementors if you were to disallow its use
> solely on those grounds.
Oh indeed ;-) My next server patch does precisely that.
Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
Here's a minimalistic fix. It may be better to change nfsd_acceptable
to return 0 on success and negative error code on error, but I'm not
sure this is really needed as long as the only acceptance test
in nfsd_acceptable is the subtree check.
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | The Hardware Gods hate me.
[email protected] |
---------------+