Following are 16 patches against nfsd in 2.6.12-rc1-mm1
Most are nfsv4 related.
Patch 2 removes an inexplicable increment of f_count for a file. This
fixes a problem wherein an exported filesystem may never be unmountable because a
file on it is never closed.
This could possibly be a candidate for 2.6.12. The rest should wait to go
in to 2.6.13-rc
NeilBrown
[PATCH kNFSd 0 of 16] Introduction
[PATCH kNFSd 1 of 16] svcrpc: auth_domain documentation
[PATCH kNFSd 2 of 16] nlm: fix f_count leak
[PATCH kNFSd 3 of 16] nfsd4: fix share conflict tests
[PATCH kNFSd 4 of 16] nfsd4: remove unneeded stateowner arguments
[PATCH kNFSd 5 of 16] nfsd4: fix use after put() in cb_recall
[PATCH kNFSd 6 of 16] nfsd4: allow read on open for write
[PATCH kNFSd 7 of 16] nfsd4: factor out common open_truncate code
[PATCH kNFSd 8 of 16] nfsd4: fix failure to truncate on some opens
[PATCH kNFSd 9 of 16] nfsd4_remove_unused_acl_function
[PATCH kNFSd 10 of 16] nfsd4: don't set WRITE_OWNER in either allow or deny bits
[PATCH kNFSd 11 of 16] nfsd4: acl don't set named attrs
[PATCH kNFSd 12 of 16] nfsd4: acl error fix
[PATCH kNFSd 13 of 16] nfsd4: rename release_delegation
[PATCH kNFSd 14 of 16] nfsd4: remove trailing whitespace from nfs4proc.c
[PATCH kNFSd 15 of 16] nfsd4: fix open returns for other claim types
[PATCH kNFSd 16 of 16] nfsd4: fix indentation in nfsd4_open
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
NeilBrown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Following are 16 patches against nfsd in 2.6.12-rc1-mm1
>
> Most are nfsv4 related.
> Patch 2 removes an inexplicable increment of f_count for a file. This
> fixes a problem wherein an exported filesystem may never be unmountable because a
> file on it is never closed.
OK, I'll send nlm-fix-f_count-leak.patch in for 2.6.12 and will buffer the
rest.
> This could possibly be a candidate for 2.6.12. The rest should wait to go
> in to 2.6.13-rc
Is it a 2.6.11.x candidate?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content. Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs