I did some optimalization of exportfs and rpc.mountd (linked
exportlist replaced by hash table). It has good results (I think) -
computing of exportfs and mountd (after running exportfs) is quicker.
Especially for long exportlists - about hundred thousand exports and
more.
Can someone look on it?
thanks
Tomas Richter
I did some optimalization of exportfs and rpc.mountd (linked
exportlist replaced by hash table). It has good results (I think) -
computing of exportfs and mountd (after running exportfs) is quicker.
Especially for long exportlists - about hundred thousand exports and
more.
Can someone look on it?
thanks
Tomas Richter
m=C3=A5 den 20.06.2005 Klokka 19:34 (+0200) skreiv Tomas Richter:
> I did some optimalization of exportfs and rpc.mountd (linked
> exportlist replaced by hash table). It has good results (I think) -
> computing of exportfs and mountd (after running exportfs) is quicker.
> Especially for long exportlists - about hundred thousand exports and
> more.
> Can someone look on it?
If you would like to propose changes to the nfs-utils package, then
please repost them in the form of a standard patch against the current
nfs-utils CVS tree (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs) so that
they may be reviewed.
Cheers,
Trond
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:34:38PM +0200, Tomas Richter wrote:
> I did some optimalization of exportfs and rpc.mountd (linked
> exportlist replaced by hash table). It has good results (I think) -
> computing of exportfs and mountd (after running exportfs) is quicker.
> Especially for long exportlists - about hundred thousand exports and
> more.
It'd be interesting to see whether you could reproduce (and improve on)
Vincent Rouqueta's results:
http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/tools/tests/page17.php
> Can someone look on it?
Could you send your changes in the form of patches? (See, e.g.,
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt).
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
Le lundi 20 Juin 2005 19:34, Tomas Richter a =E9crit=A0:
> I did some optimalization of exportfs and rpc.mountd (linked
> exportlist replaced by hash table). It has good results (I think) -
> computing of exportfs and mountd (after running exportfs) is quicker.
> Especially for long exportlists - about hundred thousand exports and
> more.
> Can someone look on it?
Yes! ;)
Vincent
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs