2005-07-12 09:05:42

by Olaf Kirch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom

Here's a patch we added to SLES in response to a customer bug report:

# Subject: Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom
#
# This patch fills the daddr member of the rpc struct svc_rqst structure for
# TCP-based sockets in the recvfrom proceedure. Currently, the field is
# not set thus leaving it with left over garbage from a previous allocation.
#
# This makes the behavior consistent between UDP- and TCP-based RPC.
#
# This patch enables HA software to failover TCP-based RPC services
# such as TCP-based NFS.
#
# Signed-off-by: [email protected]

Index: linux-2.6.12.orig/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12.orig/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2005-07-08 11:45:25.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2005-07-12 10:57:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -455,8 +455,9 @@ svc_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, str
struct socket *sock;
int len, alen;

- rqstp->rq_addrlen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);
sock = rqstp->rq_sock->sk_sock;
+ rqstp->rq_daddr = inet_sk((const struct sock *)sock)->rcv_saddr;
+ rqstp->rq_addrlen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);

msg.msg_name = &rqstp->rq_addr;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(rqstp->rq_addr);
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
[email protected] | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs


2005-07-12 16:31:59

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:04:56AM +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Here's a patch we added to SLES in response to a customer bug report:
>
> # Subject: Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom
> #
> # This patch fills the daddr member of the rpc struct svc_rqst structure for
> # TCP-based sockets in the recvfrom proceedure. Currently, the field is
> # not set thus leaving it with left over garbage from a previous allocation.
> #
> # This makes the behavior consistent between UDP- and TCP-based RPC.
> #
> # This patch enables HA software to failover TCP-based RPC services
> # such as TCP-based NFS.

Could you explain how this patch makes a difference? I can only see the
value of rq_daddr used in one place, in svc_sendto:
if (rqstp->rq_prot == IPPROTO_UDP) {
...
pki->ipi_spec_dst.s_addr = rqstp->rq_daddr;

if (sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg, 0) < 0)
goto out;
}

So it doesn't seem to be used at all in the TCP case. Am I confused?

--b.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

2005-07-13 05:18:26

by Olaf Kirch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom

Hi Bruce,

> Could you explain how this patch makes a difference? I can only see the
> value of rq_daddr used in one place, in svc_sendto:

It doesn't make a difference for the existing RPC users, but the customer
had some kernel RPC code of their own (I think some HA capable nfsd)
that needed this information for migration/failover.

It's not strictly necessary, but it doesn't hurt either - and it makes
sense in the way that UDP and TCP now fill in the same set of information.

Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
[email protected] | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

2005-07-13 14:36:18

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fill in rqstp->rq_daddr in svc_tcp_recvfrom

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:17:50AM +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> > Could you explain how this patch makes a difference? I can only see the
> > value of rq_daddr used in one place, in svc_sendto:
>
> It doesn't make a difference for the existing RPC users, but the customer
> had some kernel RPC code of their own (I think some HA capable nfsd)
> that needed this information for migration/failover.

So let the customer post the patch, including the code that uses it,
as that might actually be useful for others aswell.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs