2006-09-14 04:35:54

by Wendy Cheng

[permalink] [raw]

2007-03-28 02:45:22

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:21:01PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> Revised patch based on 2.6.21-rc4.

Were there supposed to be 4 patches? If so, where can I find the full
series?

--b.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

2007-03-28 04:22:55

by Wendy Cheng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace

J. Bruce Fields wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:21:01PM -0400, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>
>
>>Revised patch based on 2.6.21-rc4.
>>
>>
>
>Were there supposed to be 4 patches? If so, where can I find the full
>series?
>
>--b.
>
>

These are revised patches based on the discussion we had last September
(shame on me to put this off for so long).

General description:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00034.html
Patch 4-1 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00035.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00218.html
Patch 4-2 is based on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00036.html
new patch at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-March/msg00231.html
patch 4-3 original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00037.html
For 2.6.21 kernel, this patch is no longer needed.
Patch 4.4 is nfs-utils (user mode) original patch on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2006-September/msg00038.html
New patch: to be followed.

-- Wendy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

2007-03-28 23:28:41

by J. Bruce Fields

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:32:40AM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote:
> These are revised patches based on the discussion we had last September

OK. Would you remind just resending the revised versions of all of them
whenever they're ready?

It's just that applying patches off a web email archive is a bit of a
pain (there's all this & stuff to deal with, and who knows what it
does to the whitespace), while we all have piles of scripts to deal with
plain emailed patches....

Looks like interesting stuff.

--b.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

2007-03-29 04:21:52

by Wendy Cheng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 Revised] NLM failover - nlm_set_igrace

J. Bruce Fields wrote:

>On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:32:40AM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>
>
>>These are revised patches based on the discussion we had last September
>>
>>
>
>OK. Would you remind just resending the revised versions of all of them
>whenever they're ready?
>
>It's just that applying patches off a web email archive is a bit of a
>pain (there's all this & stuff to deal with, and who knows what it
>does to the whitespace), while we all have piles of scripts to deal with
>plain emailed patches....
>
>Looks like interesting stuff.
>
>--b.
>
>
Will do. We have one more patch (user space statd) to finish up - need
to look into what has been changed in Neil's new nfs-util release. I
could be his first tester (a scary thought :))..

-- Wendy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs