> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>=20
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:24:27PM -0800, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > > we tried this once already. i set up a cvstrac bug
> > > database here at=20
> > > CITI. you and i were the only ones who actually touched=20
> > > the thing, and now it is long since dead.
>=20
> Do you think any of the bugs in that system still valid? If
> so would it be possible for us to get a copy in some form (db=20
> dump or whatever)?
many of those bugs were against a 2.4 backport of the NFSv4 code, and
are thus not relevant. of the remaining bugs, only a few are of
interest, and those are widely known issues (for example, the
requirement for keyring support for session-based authentication, or the
requirement for ACL side-band protocol support in upstream kernels).
most or all of that information is documented in the priorities list at
client.linux-nfs.org.
i used the cvstrac database primarily for release planning.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs