http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=127893898208934&w=2
Based on T?r?k Edwin's message at the above URL I have written the attached
patch to grant freshclam_t and clamd_t the same access WRT execmem.
--
russell at coker.com.au
http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Main Blog
http://doc.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clam.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 380 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100713/14e16a91/attachment.bin
On 07/12/10 10:58, Russell Coker wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=127893898208934&w=2
>
> Based on T?r?k Edwin's message at the above URL I have written the attached
> patch to grant freshclam_t and clamd_t the same access WRT execmem.
I ended up doing a different implementation. The rules are all there,
just a different organization.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
http://www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com