2012-08-06 14:49:17

by Guido Trentalancia

Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v2]: mcelog module initial rewrite

Hello Dominick.

>> > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:45 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
>
><..snip ..>
>
>Also don't create patches on patches ( i think your v2 patch is a patch
>on your initial patch?)

No v2 is the second version of the initial patch bringing the same name.

So, it's a subsequent, usually revised, corrected and updated version of the initial patch which aims to tackle the same problem in a better manner and which obsoletes any previous version.

Only occasionally I think I have submitted different versions as alternatives.

Regards,

Guido

2012-08-06 14:56:27

by dominick.grift

Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v2]: mcelog module initial rewrite

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:49 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> Hello Dominick.

Hi can you review (and maybe test) my take on this?

See http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/2012-August/005358.html

Thank you

>
> >> > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 14:45 +0200, Guido Trentalancia wrote:
> >
> ><..snip ..>
> >
> >Also don't create patches on patches ( i think your v2 patch is a patch
> >on your initial patch?)
>
> No v2 is the second version of the initial patch bringing the same name.
>
> So, it's a subsequent, usually revised, corrected and updated version of the initial patch which aims to tackle the same problem in a better manner and which obsoletes any previous version.
>
> Only occasionally I think I have submitted different versions as alternatives.
>
> Regards,
>
> Guido
>