2010-03-28 11:55:12

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [patch] iwlwifi: range checking issue

IWL_RATE_COUNT is 13 and IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is 12.

IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is the right one here because iwl3945_rates
doesn't support 60M and also that's how "rates" is defined in
iwlcore_init_geos() from drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c.

rates = kzalloc((sizeof(struct ieee80211_rate) * IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY),
GFP_KERNEL);

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 54daa38..7d3806a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
@@ -1955,7 +1955,7 @@ static void iwl3945_init_hw_rates(struct iwl_priv *priv,
{
int i;

- for (i = 0; i < IWL_RATE_COUNT; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY; i++) {
rates[i].bitrate = iwl3945_rates[i].ieee * 5;
rates[i].hw_value = i; /* Rate scaling will work on indexes */
rates[i].hw_value_short = i;


2010-03-29 16:13:52

by Reinette Chatre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch] iwlwifi: range checking issue

On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 19:01 -0700, Zhu, Yi wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 19:55 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > IWL_RATE_COUNT is 13 and IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is 12.
> >
> > IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is the right one here because iwl3945_rates
> > doesn't support 60M and also that's how "rates" is defined in
> > iwlcore_init_geos() from drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c.
> >
> > rates = kzalloc((sizeof(struct ieee80211_rate) * IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Zhu Yi <[email protected]>

Great catch. Since this is a fix for a buffer overflow ... could you
please pass it on to stable also?

Thank you

Reinette


2010-03-29 02:00:32

by Zhu Yi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch] iwlwifi: range checking issue

On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 19:55 +0800, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> IWL_RATE_COUNT is 13 and IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is 12.
>
> IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY is the right one here because iwl3945_rates
> doesn't support 60M and also that's how "rates" is defined in
> iwlcore_init_geos() from drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c.
>
> rates = kzalloc((sizeof(struct ieee80211_rate) * IWL_RATE_COUNT_LEGACY),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Zhu Yi <[email protected]>

Thanks,
-yi