The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
feature.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
index 5a7eca8..5df3f88 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.c
@@ -2544,7 +2544,7 @@ void iwl_update_stats(struct iwl_priv *priv, bool is_tx, __le16 fc, u16 len)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_update_stats);
#endif
-const static char *get_csr_string(int cmd)
+static const char *get_csr_string(int cmd)
{
switch (cmd) {
IWL_CMD(CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG);
@@ -2615,7 +2615,7 @@ void iwl_dump_csr(struct iwl_priv *priv)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_dump_csr);
-const static char *get_fh_string(int cmd)
+static const char *get_fh_string(int cmd)
{
switch (cmd) {
IWL_CMD(FH_RSCSR_CHNL0_STTS_WPTR_REG);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
index b7d9137..b7a78e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_main.c
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_channel wl1271_channels[] = {
};
/* mapping to indexes for wl1271_rates */
-const static u8 wl1271_rate_to_idx_2ghz[] = {
+static const u8 wl1271_rate_to_idx_2ghz[] = {
/* MCS rates are used only with 11n */
CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_UNSUPPORTED, /* CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_MCS7 */
CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_UNSUPPORTED, /* CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_MCS6 */
@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_channel wl1271_channels_5ghz[] = {
};
/* mapping to indexes for wl1271_rates_5ghz */
-const static u8 wl1271_rate_to_idx_5ghz[] = {
+static const u8 wl1271_rate_to_idx_5ghz[] = {
/* MCS rates are used only with 11n */
CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_UNSUPPORTED, /* CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_MCS7 */
CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_UNSUPPORTED, /* CONF_HW_RXTX_RATE_MCS6 */
@@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ static struct ieee80211_supported_band wl1271_band_5ghz = {
.n_bitrates = ARRAY_SIZE(wl1271_rates_5ghz),
};
-const static u8 *wl1271_band_rate_to_idx[] = {
+static const u8 *wl1271_band_rate_to_idx[] = {
[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ] = wl1271_rate_to_idx_2ghz,
[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ] = wl1271_rate_to_idx_5ghz
};
--
1.6.3.3
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 01:38 -0700, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> ---
For the iwlwifi parts ...
Thank you
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <[email protected]>
Reinette
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:38 +0200, ext Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]>
> ---
Thanks! Regarding wl1271:
Acked-by: Luciano Coelho <[email protected]>
--
Cheers,
Luca.