2010-09-17 16:55:00

by Vipin Mehta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] staging: ath6kl: Including a header file to fix a compilation error

The commit fixes a compilation error that was encountered while using
a specific kernel configuration file. The problem was the use of some
functions defined in <linux/semaphore.h> without including the header
file explicitly. It was probably working before because of the
dependency getting implicitly satisfied via some other header file.
Also, eliminating the inclusion of the same header file more than
once. The code needs additional cleanup and may be addressed by a
subsequent commit.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vipin Mehta <[email protected]>
---
.../staging/ath6kl/miscdrv/ar3kps/ar3kpsconfig.h | 4 ----
drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/cfg80211.c | 2 --
.../staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h | 8 --------
.../staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/osapi_linux.h | 1 +
drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/netbuf.c | 2 --
5 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/miscdrv/ar3kps/ar3kpsconfig.h b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/miscdrv/ar3kps/ar3kpsconfig.h
index 4358834..4e5b7bf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/miscdrv/ar3kps/ar3kpsconfig.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/miscdrv/ar3kps/ar3kpsconfig.h
@@ -36,15 +36,11 @@

#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
-#include <linux/timer.h>


#include <linux/ioctl.h>
-#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
-#include <linux/wait.h>


#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/cfg80211.c b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/cfg80211.c
index 7a3784d..f51c5e1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/cfg80211.c
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
// Author(s): ="Atheros"
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/wireless.h>
#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
#include <net/cfg80211.h>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h
index 8be4f55..e624883 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/ar6000_drv.h
@@ -24,22 +24,14 @@
#ifndef _AR6000_H_
#define _AR6000_H_

-#include <linux/version.h>
-
-
-#include <generated/autoconf.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/if_ether.h>
-#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <net/iw_handler.h>
#include <linux/if_arp.h>
#include <linux/ip.h>
-#include <linux/semaphore.h>
#include <linux/wireless.h>
#ifdef ATH6K_CONFIG_CFG80211
#include <net/cfg80211.h>
diff --git a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/osapi_linux.h b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/osapi_linux.h
index ef7cc82..9892dfc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/osapi_linux.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/include/osapi_linux.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/semaphore.h>

#include <linux/cache.h>

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/netbuf.c b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/netbuf.c
index 63fa49c..15e5d04 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/netbuf.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ath6kl/os/linux/netbuf.c
@@ -20,8 +20,6 @@
//
// Author(s): ="Atheros"
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <a_config.h>
#include "athdefs.h"
#include "a_types.h"
--
1.6.3.3



2010-09-17 00:17:31

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ath6kl: Including a header file to fix a compilation error


A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:13:17PM -0700, Vipin Mehta wrote:
> You meant 70 characters. Right ?

72 characters please.