From: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
that.
This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
Stanislaw Gruszka.
Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
---
Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
wireless-next tree.
Gr. AvS
---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c | 14 +++++++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/pub.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
u8 mcs = 0;
- bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
+ bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
uint supr_status;
bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
@@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
ack_recd = false;
+ last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
+ TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
if (ba_recd) {
bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
BCMMSG(wiphy,
@@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
tot_mpdu++;
/* break out if last packet of ampdu */
- if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
- TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
+ if (last_packet)
break;
p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
index a744ea5..5590499 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static void brcms_ops_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
kfree_skb(skb);
goto done;
}
- brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(wl->wlc, skb, hw);
- tx_info->rate_driver_data[0] = control->sta;
+ if (brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(wl->wlc, skb, hw))
+ tx_info->rate_driver_data[0] = control->sta;
done:
spin_unlock_bh(&wl->lock);
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
index 75086b3..9fb0a4c9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
@@ -6095,7 +6095,7 @@ static bool brcms_c_prec_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct pktq *q,
return brcms_c_prec_enq_head(wlc, q, pkt, prec, false);
}
-void brcms_c_txq_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct scb *scb,
+bool brcms_c_txq_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct scb *scb,
struct sk_buff *sdu, uint prec)
{
struct brcms_txq_info *qi = wlc->pkt_queue; /* Check me */
@@ -6110,7 +6110,9 @@ void brcms_c_txq_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct scb *scb,
* packet flooding from mac80211 stack
*/
brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(sdu);
+ return false;
}
+ return true;
}
/*
@@ -7273,7 +7275,7 @@ brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
return 0;
}
-void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
+bool brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
{
u8 prio;
@@ -7288,10 +7290,12 @@ void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
prio = ieee80211_is_data(d11_header->frame_control) ? sdu->priority :
MAXPRIO;
fifo = prio2fifo[prio];
- if (brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0))
- return;
- brcms_c_txq_enq(wlc, scb, sdu, BRCMS_PRIO_TO_PREC(prio));
+ brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0);
+ if (!brcms_c_txq_enq(wlc, scb, sdu, BRCMS_PRIO_TO_PREC(prio)))
+ return false;
brcms_c_send_q(wlc);
+
+ return true;
}
void brcms_c_send_q(struct brcms_c_info *wlc)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.h
index 8debc74..b44725c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.h
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ extern void brcms_c_txfifo(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, uint fifo,
bool commit, s8 txpktpend);
extern void brcms_c_txfifo_complete(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, uint fifo,
s8 txpktpend);
-extern void brcms_c_txq_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct scb *scb,
+extern bool brcms_c_txq_enq(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct scb *scb,
struct sk_buff *sdu, uint prec);
extern void brcms_c_print_txstatus(struct tx_status *txs);
extern int brcms_b_xmtfifo_sz_get(struct brcms_hardware *wlc_hw, uint fifo,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/pub.h b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/pub.h
index 5855f4f..bfa2630 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/pub.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/pub.h
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ extern void brcms_c_intrsrestore(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, u32 macintmask);
extern bool brcms_c_intrsupd(struct brcms_c_info *wlc);
extern bool brcms_c_isr(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, bool *wantdpc);
extern bool brcms_c_dpc(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, bool bounded);
-extern void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc,
+extern bool brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc,
struct sk_buff *sdu,
struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
extern bool brcms_c_aggregatable(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, u8 tid);
--
1.7.10.4
On 11/26/2012 03:55 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> From: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
>>
>> In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
>> the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
>> callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
>> that.
>>
>> This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
>> Stanislaw Gruszka.
>>
>> Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
>>
>> Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
>> fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
>> differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
>> wireless-next tree.
>
> Let me know if I can be of help in resolving the conflicts. Fwiw the fix
> looks like it ought to be easy to make on top of wireless-next, but I do
> have a couple of comments.
I have fix for wireless-next available already. Will post it later today.
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>> index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>> @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>> struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
>> u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
>> u8 mcs = 0;
>> - bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
>> + bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
>> u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
>> uint supr_status;
>> bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
>> @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>
>> index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
>> ack_recd = false;
>> + last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>> + TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
>> if (ba_recd) {
>> bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
>> BCMMSG(wiphy,
>> @@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>> tot_mpdu++;
>>
>> /* break out if last packet of ampdu */
>> - if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>> - TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
>> + if (last_packet)
>> break;
>>
>> p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
>
> These changes are effectively a no-op and don't really seem to have
> anything to do with fixing the bug.
Agree. I noticed that as well and was in doubt whether I should keep it
or not. The commit message does not cover this so I resubmit the patch
(already did).
>> @@ -7288,10 +7290,12 @@ void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
>> prio = ieee80211_is_data(d11_header->frame_control) ? sdu->priority :
>> MAXPRIO;
>> fifo = prio2fifo[prio];
>> - if (brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0))
>> - return;
>> - brcms_c_txq_enq(wlc, scb, sdu, BRCMS_PRIO_TO_PREC(prio));
>> + brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0);
>
> Maybe brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211() should return void? I've never
> understood what its return value was supposed to represent.
All code patch in the function return 0 so it could be made void.
Gr. AvS
On 11/26/2012 08:20 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:55:11AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> From: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
>>> the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
>>> callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
>>> that.
>>>
>>> This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
>>> Stanislaw Gruszka.
>>>
>>> Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
>>> fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
>>> differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
>>> wireless-next tree.
>>
>> Let me know if I can be of help in resolving the conflicts. Fwiw the fix
>> looks like it ought to be easy to make on top of wireless-next, but I do
>> have a couple of comments.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
>>> @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>> struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
>>> u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
>>> u8 mcs = 0;
>>> - bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
>>> + bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
>>> u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
>>> uint supr_status;
>>> bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
>>> @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>>
>>> index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
>>> ack_recd = false;
>>> + last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>>> + TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
>>> if (ba_recd) {
>>> bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
>>> BCMMSG(wiphy,
>>> @@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>>> tot_mpdu++;
>>>
>>> /* break out if last packet of ampdu */
>>> - if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
>>> - TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
>>> + if (last_packet)
>>> break;
>>>
>>> p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
>>
>> These changes are effectively a no-op and don't really seem to have
>> anything to do with fixing the bug.
>
> I concur -- could you remove these bits for the 3.7 fix?
>
True. Will resend it.
Gr. AvS
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> From: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
>
> In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
> the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
> callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
> that.
>
> This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
> Stanislaw Gruszka.
>
> Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
>
> Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
> ---
> Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
> fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
> differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
> wireless-next tree.
Let me know if I can be of help in resolving the conflicts. Fwiw the fix
looks like it ought to be easy to make on top of wireless-next, but I do
have a couple of comments.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
> struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
> u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
> u8 mcs = 0;
> - bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
> + bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
> u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
> uint supr_status;
> bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
> @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
>
> index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
> ack_recd = false;
> + last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
> + TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
> if (ba_recd) {
> bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
> BCMMSG(wiphy,
> @@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
> tot_mpdu++;
>
> /* break out if last packet of ampdu */
> - if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
> - TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
> + if (last_packet)
> break;
>
> p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
These changes are effectively a no-op and don't really seem to have
anything to do with fixing the bug.
> @@ -7288,10 +7290,12 @@ void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
> prio = ieee80211_is_data(d11_header->frame_control) ? sdu->priority :
> MAXPRIO;
> fifo = prio2fifo[prio];
> - if (brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0))
> - return;
> - brcms_c_txq_enq(wlc, scb, sdu, BRCMS_PRIO_TO_PREC(prio));
> + brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0);
Maybe brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211() should return void? I've never
understood what its return value was supposed to represent.
Cheers,
Seth
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 08:55:11AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:44:42PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > From: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
> >
> > In the event that tx packet can not be queued by the driver
> > the packet is dropped. Propagate that information to the .tx()
> > callback to make sure the freed packet is not accessed after
> > that.
> >
> > This has happened causing slab corruptions as reported by
> > Stanislaw Gruszka.
> >
> > Bug #47721: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47721
> >
> > Reported-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Fixing a kernel bug so based on the wireless repository. The
> > fix for wireless-next will be posted separately as the patches
> > differ. So this patch does not need to be merged to the
> > wireless-next tree.
>
> Let me know if I can be of help in resolving the conflicts. Fwiw the fix
> looks like it ought to be easy to make on top of wireless-next, but I do
> have a couple of comments.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> > index be5bcfb..a6605b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/ampdu.c
> > @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
> > struct ieee80211_hdr *h;
> > u16 seq, start_seq = 0, bindex, index, mcl;
> > u8 mcs = 0;
> > - bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false;
> > + bool ba_recd = false, ack_recd = false, last_packet = false;
> > u8 suc_mpdu = 0, tot_mpdu = 0;
> > uint supr_status;
> > bool update_rate = true, retry = true, tx_error = false;
> > @@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
> >
> > index = TX_SEQ_TO_INDEX(seq);
> > ack_recd = false;
> > + last_packet = (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
> > + TXC_AMPDU_LAST);
> > if (ba_recd) {
> > bindex = MODSUB_POW2(seq, start_seq, SEQNUM_MAX);
> > BCMMSG(wiphy,
> > @@ -1074,8 +1076,7 @@ brcms_c_ampdu_dotxstatus_complete(struct ampdu_info *ampdu, struct scb *scb,
> > tot_mpdu++;
> >
> > /* break out if last packet of ampdu */
> > - if (((mcl & TXC_AMPDU_MASK) >> TXC_AMPDU_SHIFT) ==
> > - TXC_AMPDU_LAST)
> > + if (last_packet)
> > break;
> >
> > p = dma_getnexttxp(wlc->hw->di[queue], DMA_RANGE_TRANSMITTED);
>
> These changes are effectively a no-op and don't really seem to have
> anything to do with fixing the bug.
I concur -- could you remove these bits for the 3.7 fix?
>
> > @@ -7288,10 +7290,12 @@ void brcms_c_sendpkt_mac80211(struct brcms_c_info *wlc, struct sk_buff *sdu,
> > prio = ieee80211_is_data(d11_header->frame_control) ? sdu->priority :
> > MAXPRIO;
> > fifo = prio2fifo[prio];
> > - if (brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0))
> > - return;
> > - brcms_c_txq_enq(wlc, scb, sdu, BRCMS_PRIO_TO_PREC(prio));
> > + brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211(wlc, hw, sdu, scb, 0, 1, fifo, 0);
>
> Maybe brcms_c_d11hdrs_mac80211() should return void? I've never
> understood what its return value was supposed to represent.
>
> Cheers,
> Seth
>
>
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.