We already have rf_vals_3x with same values. Hence rf_vals_3053 is removed
in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
index f414978..deb8a01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
@@ -7416,72 +7416,6 @@ static const struct rf_channel
rf_vals_5592_xtal40[] = {
{196, 83, 0, 12, 1},
};
-static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_3053[] = {
- /* Channel, N, R, K */
- {1, 241, 2, 2},
- {2, 241, 2, 7},
- {3, 242, 2, 2},
- {4, 242, 2, 7},
- {5, 243, 2, 2},
- {6, 243, 2, 7},
- {7, 244, 2, 2},
- {8, 244, 2, 7},
- {9, 245, 2, 2},
- {10, 245, 2, 7},
- {11, 246, 2, 2},
- {12, 246, 2, 7},
- {13, 247, 2, 2},
- {14, 248, 2, 4},
-
- {36, 0x56, 0, 4},
- {38, 0x56, 0, 6},
- {40, 0x56, 0, 8},
- {44, 0x57, 0, 0},
- {46, 0x57, 0, 2},
- {48, 0x57, 0, 4},
- {52, 0x57, 0, 8},
- {54, 0x57, 0, 10},
- {56, 0x58, 0, 0},
- {60, 0x58, 0, 4},
- {62, 0x58, 0, 6},
- {64, 0x58, 0, 8},
-
- {100, 0x5B, 0, 8},
- {102, 0x5B, 0, 10},
- {104, 0x5C, 0, 0},
- {108, 0x5C, 0, 4},
- {110, 0x5C, 0, 6},
- {112, 0x5C, 0, 8},
-
- /* NOTE: Channel 114 has been removed intentionally.
- * The EEPROM contains no TX power values for that,
- * and it is disabled in the vendor driver as well.
- */
-
- {116, 0x5D, 0, 0},
- {118, 0x5D, 0, 2},
- {120, 0x5D, 0, 4},
- {124, 0x5D, 0, 8},
- {126, 0x5D, 0, 10},
- {128, 0x5E, 0, 0},
- {132, 0x5E, 0, 4},
- {134, 0x5E, 0, 6},
- {136, 0x5E, 0, 8},
- {140, 0x5F, 0, 0},
-
- {149, 0x5F, 0, 9},
- {151, 0x5F, 0, 11},
- {153, 0x60, 0, 1},
- {157, 0x60, 0, 5},
- {159, 0x60, 0, 7},
- {161, 0x60, 0, 9},
- {165, 0x61, 0, 1},
- {167, 0x61, 0, 3},
- {169, 0x61, 0, 5},
- {171, 0x61, 0, 7},
- {173, 0x61, 0, 9},
-};
-
static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
{
struct hw_mode_spec *spec = &rt2x00dev->spec;
@@ -7570,14 +7504,11 @@ static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct
rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5392)) {
spec->num_channels = 14;
spec->channels = rf_vals_3x;
- } else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3052)) {
+ } else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3052) ||
+ rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3053)) {
spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
spec->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rf_vals_3x);
spec->channels = rf_vals_3x;
- } else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3053)) {
- spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
- spec->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rf_vals_3053);
- spec->channels = rf_vals_3053;
} else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5592)) {
spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
Gabor Juhos wrote:
> 2013.10.03. 9:48 keltez?ssel, Kevin Lo ?rta:
>> We already have rf_vals_3x with same values. Hence rf_vals_3053 is removed
>> in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <[email protected]>
> For completeness, the comment of rf_vals_3x should be updated to indicate that
> it also supports RF3053. Otherwise the patch is fine.
Ok, I'll send an updated patch, thanks.
>
> -Gabor
>
Kevin
2013.10.03. 9:48 keltez?ssel, Kevin Lo ?rta:
> We already have rf_vals_3x with same values. Hence rf_vals_3053 is removed
> in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <[email protected]>
For completeness, the comment of rf_vals_3x should be updated to indicate that
it also supports RF3053. Otherwise the patch is fine.
-Gabor
Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2013, 15:48 +0800 schrieb Kevin Lo:
> We already have rf_vals_3x with same values. Hence rf_vals_3053 is removed
> in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
[…]
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>