rtl8192ce is disabling for too long the local interrupts during hw initiatialisation when performing scans
The observable symptoms in dmesg can be:
- underruns from ALSA playback
- clock freezes (tstamps do not change for several dmesg entries until irqs are finaly reenabled):
[ 250.817669] rtlwifi:rtl_op_config():<0-0-0> 0x100
[ 250.817685] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_phy_set_rf_power_state():<0-1-0> IPS Set eRf nic enable
[ 250.817732] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.817796] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.817910] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818024] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818139] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818253] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818367] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:98053f15:10
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_sw_led_on():<0-1-0> LedAddr:4E ledpin=1
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_download_fw():<0-1-0> Firmware Version(49), Signature(0x88c1),Size(32)
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_enable_hw_security_config():<0-1-0> PairwiseEncAlgorithm = 0 GroupEncAlgorithm = 0
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_enable_hw_security_config():<0-1-0> The SECR-value cc
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_check_txpower_tracking_thermal_meter():<0-1-0> Schedule TxPowerTracking direct call!!
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Readback Thermal Meter = 0xe pre thermal meter 0xf eeprom_thermalmeter 0xf
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Initial pathA ele_d reg0xc80 = 0x40000000, ofdm_index=0xc
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Initial reg0xa24 = 0x90e1317, cck_index=0xc, ch14 0
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Readback Thermal Meter = 0xe pre thermal meter 0xf eeprom_thermalmeter 0xf delta 0x1 delta_lck 0x0 delta_iqk 0x0
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> <===
[ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_initialize_txpower_tracking_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> pMgntInfo->txpower_tracking = 1
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_led_control():<0-1-0> ledaction 3
[ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_sw_led_on():<0-1-0> LedAddr:4E ledpin=1
[ 250.818472] rtlwifi:rtl_ips_nic_on():<0-1-0> before spin_unlock_irqrestore
[ 251.154656] PCM: Lost interrupts? [Q]-0 (stream=0, delta=15903, new_hw_ptr=293408, old_hw_ptr=277505)
The exact code flow that causes that is:
1. wpa_supplicant send a start_scan request to the nl80211 driver
2. mac80211 module call rtl_op_config with IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE
3. rtl_ips_nic_on is called which disable local irqs
4. rtl92c_phy_set_rf_power_state() is called
5. rtl_ps_enable_nic() is called and hw_init()is executed and interrupts on the device
A good solution could be to refactor the code to avoid calling rtl92ce_hw_init() with the irqs disabled
but a quick and dirty solution that has proven to work is
to reenable the irqs during the function rtl92ce_hw_init().
I think that it is safe doing so since the device interrupt will only be enabled after the init function succeed.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
index 0d81f76..a56e9b3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ bool rtl_ps_enable_nic(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
/*<2> Enable Adapter */
if (rtlpriv->cfg->ops->hw_init(hw))
- return 1;
+ return false;
RT_CLEAR_PS_LEVEL(ppsc, RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC);
/*<3> Enable Interrupt */
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
index a82b30a..2eb0b38 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c
@@ -937,14 +937,26 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
bool is92c;
int err;
u8 tmp_u1b;
+ unsigned long flags;
rtlpci->being_init_adapter = true;
+
+ /* Since this function can take a very long time (up to 350 ms)
+ * and can be called with irqs disabled, reenable the irqs
+ * to let the other devices continue being serviced.
+ *
+ * It is safe doing so since our own interrupts will only be enabled
+ * in a subsequent step.
+ */
+ local_save_flags(flags);
+ local_irq_enable();
+
rtlpriv->intf_ops->disable_aspm(hw);
rtstatus = _rtl92ce_init_mac(hw);
if (!rtstatus) {
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_EMERG, "Init MAC failed\n");
err = 1;
- return err;
+ goto exit;
}
err = rtl92c_download_fw(hw);
@@ -952,7 +964,7 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_WARNING,
"Failed to download FW. Init HW without FW now..\n");
err = 1;
- return err;
+ goto exit;
}
rtlhal->last_hmeboxnum = 0;
@@ -1032,6 +1044,8 @@ int rtl92ce_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_INIT, DBG_TRACE, "under 1.5V\n");
}
rtl92c_dm_init(hw);
+exit:
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
rtlpci->being_init_adapter = false;
return err;
}
--
1.8.5.2
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 14:19 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 01/30/2014 12:22 AM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Olivier,
>
> I like the fact that you have proposed a solution that has minimal effect on the
> other PCI drivers under rtlwifi. That certainly decreases the amount of testing
> needed. Of course, all of them may need the same kind of fix.
This has been done on purpose. I knew that you would appreciate. The
problem is probably present with the other cards but since I could not
validate or test the patch with them, I have left them unchanged. If you
were to determine that it apply to all of them then maybe the patch
could be moved to ps.c to wrap hw_init() call.
>
> The changes are certainly minimal; however, I do need to test them before giving
> my Ack.
>
> As the problem(s) fixed by this patch will affect stable kernels, you should add
> a "Cc: Stable <[email protected]>" patch.
>
> Originally, I was going to have you add a comment to the commit message on why
> you were changing the return value in rtl_ps_enable_nic(), but now I am thinking
> that this should be a separate commit as it fixes a totally different bug. Yes
> it is involved with the callback to hw_init, but the bug is independent.
done. I am about to resend the patch splitted into 2 commits.
>
> Good work on finding this problem.
>
my pleasure. it has been fun and gratifying.
On 01/30/2014 12:22 AM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> rtl8192ce is disabling for too long the local interrupts during hw initiatialisation when performing scans
>
> The observable symptoms in dmesg can be:
>
> - underruns from ALSA playback
> - clock freezes (tstamps do not change for several dmesg entries until irqs are finaly reenabled):
>
> [ 250.817669] rtlwifi:rtl_op_config():<0-0-0> 0x100
> [ 250.817685] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_phy_set_rf_power_state():<0-1-0> IPS Set eRf nic enable
> [ 250.817732] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.817796] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.817910] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818024] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818139] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818253] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818367] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:18051d59:11
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:_rtl92ce_init_mac():<0-1-0> reg0xec:98053f15:10
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_sw_led_on():<0-1-0> LedAddr:4E ledpin=1
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_download_fw():<0-1-0> Firmware Version(49), Signature(0x88c1),Size(32)
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_enable_hw_security_config():<0-1-0> PairwiseEncAlgorithm = 0 GroupEncAlgorithm = 0
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_enable_hw_security_config():<0-1-0> The SECR-value cc
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_check_txpower_tracking_thermal_meter():<0-1-0> Schedule TxPowerTracking direct call!!
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Readback Thermal Meter = 0xe pre thermal meter 0xf eeprom_thermalmeter 0xf
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Initial pathA ele_d reg0xc80 = 0x40000000, ofdm_index=0xc
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Initial reg0xa24 = 0x90e1317, cck_index=0xc, ch14 0
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> Readback Thermal Meter = 0xe pre thermal meter 0xf eeprom_thermalmeter 0xf delta 0x1 delta_lck 0x0 delta_iqk 0x0
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> <===
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_dm_initialize_txpower_tracking_thermalmeter():<0-1-0> pMgntInfo->txpower_tracking = 1
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_led_control():<0-1-0> ledaction 3
> [ 250.818472] rtl8192ce:rtl92ce_sw_led_on():<0-1-0> LedAddr:4E ledpin=1
> [ 250.818472] rtlwifi:rtl_ips_nic_on():<0-1-0> before spin_unlock_irqrestore
> [ 251.154656] PCM: Lost interrupts? [Q]-0 (stream=0, delta=15903, new_hw_ptr=293408, old_hw_ptr=277505)
>
> The exact code flow that causes that is:
>
> 1. wpa_supplicant send a start_scan request to the nl80211 driver
> 2. mac80211 module call rtl_op_config with IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_IDLE
> 3. rtl_ips_nic_on is called which disable local irqs
> 4. rtl92c_phy_set_rf_power_state() is called
> 5. rtl_ps_enable_nic() is called and hw_init()is executed and interrupts on the device
>
> A good solution could be to refactor the code to avoid calling rtl92ce_hw_init() with the irqs disabled
> but a quick and dirty solution that has proven to work is
> to reenable the irqs during the function rtl92ce_hw_init().
>
> I think that it is safe doing so since the device interrupt will only be enabled after the init function succeed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/ps.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192ce/hw.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Olivier,
I like the fact that you have proposed a solution that has minimal effect on the
other PCI drivers under rtlwifi. That certainly decreases the amount of testing
needed. Of course, all of them may need the same kind of fix.
The changes are certainly minimal; however, I do need to test them before giving
my Ack.
As the problem(s) fixed by this patch will affect stable kernels, you should add
a "Cc: Stable <[email protected]>" patch.
Originally, I was going to have you add a comment to the commit message on why
you were changing the return value in rtl_ps_enable_nic(), but now I am thinking
that this should be a separate commit as it fixes a totally different bug. Yes
it is involved with the callback to hw_init, but the bug is independent.
Good work on finding this problem.
Larry