From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
This patch adds fix to set carrier state off during ndo_open.
Carrier should be set to ON when device is ready to send data.
In case of station/adhoc interface device is able to transfer
data after successful association/join operation.
For AP this would be after bss_active event.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
index 6125d1c..a16c293 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
@@ -562,7 +562,8 @@ static int mwifiex_init_hw_fw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
static int
mwifiex_open(struct net_device *dev)
{
- netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
+ netif_carrier_off(dev);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.4
Avinash Patil <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 02:24 -0800, Avinash Patil wrote:
>> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
>>
>> This patch adds fix to set carrier state off during ndo_open.
>> Carrier should be set to ON when device is ready to send data.
>> In case of station/adhoc interface device is able to transfer
>> data after successful association/join operation.
>> For AP this would be after bss_active event.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil <[email protected]>
[...]
> I do not see this patch in master branch as well as in patchworks
> pending patchlist. Is this one also dropped? Do you want me to resend
> this as well while I am sending rebased DFS patches?
I had accidentally marked this patch as "Not Applicable" in patchwork,
sorry about that. Good thing that you noticed. I have applied the patch
now.
--
Kalle Valo
> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
>
> This patch adds fix to set carrier state off during ndo_open.
> Carrier should be set to ON when device is ready to send data.
> In case of station/adhoc interface device is able to transfer
> data after successful association/join operation.
> For AP this would be after bss_active event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil <[email protected]>
Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers-next.git.
Kalle Valo
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 02:24 -0800, Avinash Patil wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
>
> This patch adds fix to set carrier state off during ndo_open.
> Carrier should be set to ON when device is ready to send data.
> In case of station/adhoc interface device is able to transfer
> data after successful association/join operation.
> For AP this would be after bss_active event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
> index 6125d1c..a16c293 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,8 @@ static int mwifiex_init_hw_fw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
> static int
> mwifiex_open(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> - netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
> + netif_carrier_off(dev);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Hi Kalle,
I do not see this patch in master branch as well as in patchworks
pending patchlist. Is this one also dropped?
Do you want me to resend this as well while I am sending rebased DFS
patches?
Thanks,
Avinash
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 09:42 -0800, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Avinash Patil <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 02:24 -0800, Avinash Patil wrote:
> >> From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> This patch adds fix to set carrier state off during ndo_open.
> >> Carrier should be set to ON when device is ready to send data.
> >> In case of station/adhoc interface device is able to transfer
> >> data after successful association/join operation.
> >> For AP this would be after bss_active event.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Avinash Patil <[email protected]>
>
> [...]
>
> > I do not see this patch in master branch as well as in patchworks
> > pending patchlist. Is this one also dropped? Do you want me to resend
> > this as well while I am sending rebased DFS patches?
>
> I had accidentally marked this patch as "Not Applicable" in patchwork,
> sorry about that. Good thing that you noticed. I have applied the patch
> now.
>
Thanks, Kalle.
-Avinash