2015-12-17 15:00:53

by Zhaoxiu Zeng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking

If the result of adding the first set bit to the mask is power of 2,
the mask must be contiguous. "mask & -mask" can get the first set bit
of mask gracefully.

Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoxiu <[email protected]>
---
net/mac80211/iface.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/iface.c b/net/mac80211/iface.c
index c9e325d..4c896e8 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/iface.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c
@@ -1628,7 +1628,9 @@ static void ieee80211_assign_perm_addr(struct ieee80211_local *local,
((u64)m[2] << 3*8) | ((u64)m[3] << 2*8) |
((u64)m[4] << 1*8) | ((u64)m[5] << 0*8);

- if (__ffs64(mask) + hweight64(mask) != fls64(mask)) {
+ inc = (mask & -mask);
+ val = mask + inc;
+ if ((val & (val - 1)) != 0) {
/* not a contiguous mask ... not handled now! */
pr_info("not contiguous\n");
break;
@@ -1649,7 +1651,6 @@ static void ieee80211_assign_perm_addr(struct ieee80211_local *local,
((u64)m[2] << 3*8) | ((u64)m[3] << 2*8) |
((u64)m[4] << 1*8) | ((u64)m[5] << 0*8);

- inc = 1ULL<<__ffs64(mask);
val = (start & mask);
addr = (start & ~mask) | (val & mask);
do {
--
2.5.0



2015-12-17 15:04:36

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mac80211: improve the contiguous mask checking

On Thu, 2015-12-17 at 22:59 +0800, Zeng Zhaoxiu wrote:
> If the result of adding the first set bit to the mask is power of 2,
> the mask must be contiguous. "mask & -mask" can get the first set bit
> of mask gracefully.

> - if (__ffs64(mask) + hweight64(mask) != fls64(mask))
> {
> + inc = (mask & -mask);
> + val = mask + inc;
> + if ((val & (val - 1)) != 0) {
>   /* not a contiguous mask ... not handled now! */

Hm. Ok, I can see how that would work, but it doesn't really seem like
much of an "improvement" to me? Surely I seem to need much more
thinking to understand this. There's no reason to optimise it either,
so why should we change it?

johannes