On 1/4/2024 5:01 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
> index 010e31f432c9..f9fe555b8506 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/pwrseq/Kconfig
> @@ -6,3 +6,14 @@ menuconfig PCIE_PWRSEQ
> help
> Say yes here to enable support for PCIe power sequencing
> drivers.
> +
> +if PCIE_PWRSEQ
> +
> +config PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
> + tristate "PCIe Power Sequencing driver for QCA6390"
> + depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + Enable support for the PCIe power sequencing driver for the
> + ath11k module of the QCA6390 WLAN/BT chip.
> +
> +endif
As I mentioned in the 5/9 patch I'm concerned that the current
definition of PCIE_PWRSEQ and PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390 will effectively hide
the fact that QCA6390 may need additional configuration since the menu
item will only show up if you have already enabled PCIE_PWRSEQ.
Yes I see that these are set in the defconfig in 9/9 but I'm concerned
about the more generic case.
I'm wondering if there should be a separate config QCA6390 within ath11k
which would then select PCIE_PWRSEQ and PCIE_PWRSEQ_QCA6390
/jeff