2009-01-16 16:12:10

by Sujith

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] ath9k: Handle holding descriptor in TX completion properly

If the current holding descriptor is the last one in the TX queue,
*and* it has been marked as STALE, then move it to the free list
and bail out, as it has already been processed.

Signed-off-by: Sujith <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c
index 841bd9c..d7cec0f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/xmit.c
@@ -2082,16 +2082,23 @@ static void ath_tx_processq(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_txq *txq)
if (bf->bf_status & ATH_BUFSTATUS_STALE) {
bf_held = bf;
if (list_is_last(&bf_held->list, &txq->axq_q)) {
- /* FIXME:
+ txq->axq_link = NULL;
+ txq->axq_linkbuf = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);
+
+ /*
* The holding descriptor is the last
* descriptor in queue. It's safe to remove
* the last holding descriptor in BH context.
*/
- spin_unlock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sc->tx.txbuflock);
+ list_move_tail(&bf_held->list, &sc->tx.txbuf);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sc->tx.txbuflock);
+
break;
} else {
bf = list_entry(bf_held->list.next,
- struct ath_buf, list);
+ struct ath_buf, list);
}
}

@@ -2115,24 +2122,20 @@ static void ath_tx_processq(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_txq *txq)
*/
lastbf->bf_status |= ATH_BUFSTATUS_STALE;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bf_head);
-
if (!list_is_singular(&lastbf->list))
list_cut_position(&bf_head,
&txq->axq_q, lastbf->list.prev);

txq->axq_depth--;
-
if (bf_isaggr(bf))
txq->axq_aggr_depth--;

txok = (ds->ds_txstat.ts_status == 0);
-
spin_unlock_bh(&txq->axq_lock);

if (bf_held) {
- list_del(&bf_held->list);
spin_lock_bh(&sc->tx.txbuflock);
- list_add_tail(&bf_held->list, &sc->tx.txbuf);
+ list_move_tail(&bf_held->list, &sc->tx.txbuf);
spin_unlock_bh(&sc->tx.txbuflock);
}

--
1.6.0.3