I have a rt2500pci card on an 64 bit system (Ubuntu) AMD X2 processor and i'm
trying latest vanilla kernels i've used a 2.6.24-rc5 kernel without mayor issues
(except that i have to issue a sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M because it allways
connect at 1Mbit and it is dog slow) but now with v2.6.24-rc6-83-g5b825ed i
have my dmesg spammed with:
[ 1122.323489] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.323491] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.326139] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.326142] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.327508] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.327511] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.329405] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.329409] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.332519] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.332522] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.334444] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.334447] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.336847] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.336850] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.338654] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.338657] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.340844] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.340847] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.343035] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.343038] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.344301] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.344303] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.347146] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
[ 1122.347148] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com.
[ 1122.349381] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
The connection seems top work anyways so i do not think this is critical.
Thanks in advance for your time.
On Saturday, 22 of December 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fern=E1ndez wrote:
>=20
> I have a rt2500pci card on an 64 bit system (Ubuntu) AMD X2 processo=
r and i'm
> trying latest vanilla kernels i've used a 2.6.24-rc5 kernel without m=
ayor issues
> (except that i have to issue a sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M because i=
t allways
> connect at 1Mbit and it is dog slow) but now with v2.6.24-rc6-83-g5b8=
25ed i
> have my dmesg spammed with:
>=20
>=20
> [ 1122.323489] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.323491] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.326139] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.326142] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.327508] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.327511] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.329405] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.329409] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.332519] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.332522] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.334444] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.334447] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.336847] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.336850] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.338654] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.338657] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.340844] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.340847] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.343035] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.343038] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.344301] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.344303] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.347146] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
> [ 1122.347148] Please file bug report to http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.c=
om.
> [ 1122.349381] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at no=
n-free entry in the non-full queue 0.
>=20
> The connection seems top work anyways so i do not think this is crit=
ical.
> Thanks in advance for your time.
I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9622
and added it to the list of reported regressions.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Saturday, 22 of December 2007, drago01 wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2007 12:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> >[..]
> > > The connection seems top work anyways so i do not think this is critical.
> > > Thanks in advance for your time.
> >
> > I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9622
> > and added it to the list of reported regressions.
>
> rt2x00 has been merged in 2.6.24 (did not exist in 2.6.23) so its not
> a regression.
OK, I'll drop it from the regreesion list, but the issue remains. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
El Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:04:42 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> escribi=C3=B3:
> On Saturday, 22 of December 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fern=C3=A1ndez wr=
ote:
>
>=20
> I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9622
> and added it to the list of reported regressions.
Thanks!
>=20
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne=
l" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Dec 23, 2007 12:04 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
>[..]
> > The connection seems top work anyways so i do not think this is critical.
> > Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9622
> and added it to the list of reported regressions.
rt2x00 has been merged in 2.6.24 (did not exist in 2.6.23) so its not
a regression.