Hi!
In all of 2.6.26-rc1, rc2 and rc3, my iwl3945 wifi card can't associate with my access point.
It does associate in 2.6.25.
under 2.6.-26-rc[1,2,3] wpa_supplicant reports:
Trying to associate with 00:16:e3:ef:5d:f0 (SSID='' freq=0 MHz)
Authentication with 00:00:00:00:00:00 timed out.
where under 2.6.25 I was associating with
Trying to associate with 00:16:e3:ef:5d:f0 (SSID='SIEMENS-EF5DF0' freq=2437 MHz)
Associated with 00:16:e3:ef:5d:f0
WPA: Key negotiation completed with 00:16:e3:ef:5d:f0 [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP]
I tried bisecting, and I got as far as
git-bisect good 4b119e21d0c66c22e8ca03df05d9de623d0eb50f
git-bisect bad 96d510566e4908f77f03ff1436c78ae7162a17d0
but a point between these 2 commits gets me iwl driver that hangs kernel
when it's loaded, so I gave up on bisecting at this point.
Still this leaves us with 91 candidates that might be introducing the regression
(get their list with git log
4b119e21d0c66c22e8ca03df05d9de623d0eb50f..96d510566e4908f77f03ff1436c78ae7162a17d0)
Additional info:
I get this in dmesg
[ 99.153033] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
[ 99.204031] PM: Adding info for No Bus:iwl-phy1:radio
[ 99.204031] Registered led device: iwl-phy1:radio
[ 99.204031] PM: Adding info for No Bus:iwl-phy1:assoc
[ 99.204031] Registered led device: iwl-phy1:assoc
[ 99.204031] PM: Adding info for No Bus:iwl-phy1:RX
[ 99.204031] Registered led device: iwl-phy1:RX
[ 99.204031] PM: Adding info for No Bus:iwl-phy1:TX
[ 99.204031] Registered led device: iwl-phy1:TX
[ 99.220405] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
and even though the led now lights up, there's no association.
portions of .config: 2.6.26-rc3:
CONFIG_IWLWIFI=m
CONFIG_IWLCORE=m
# CONFIG_IWLWIFI_LEDS is not set
CONFIG_IWLWIFI_RFKILL=y
# CONFIG_IWL4965 is not set
CONFIG_IWL3945=m
CONFIG_IWL3945_SPECTRUM_MEASUREMENT=y
CONFIG_IWL3945_LEDS=y
CONFIG_IWL3945_DEBUG=y
2.6.25:
# CONFIG_IWL4965 is not set
CONFIG_IWL3945=m
CONFIG_IWL3945_QOS=y
CONFIG_IWL3945_SPECTRUM_MEASUREMENT=y
CONFIG_IWL3945_DEBUG=y
What kind of additional information would be useful for debugging this regression?
Thanks!
--
MST
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:47:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> FYI, I created an item in bugzilla to track this
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10765
As requested, more configuration and log files have been attached
to this item.
FYI, I created an item in bugzilla to track this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10765
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:47:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> FYI, I created an item in bugzilla to track this
>> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10765
>> >
>> > As requested, more configuration and log files have been attached
>> > to this item.
>>
>> It looks like also this issue should be fixed by ' mac80211: reorder
>> channel and freq reporting in wext scan report' patch.
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/15177
>> Please try.
>> Thanks
>> Tomas
>
> I can confirm that the patch linked above has solved the regression for me.
> Is it queued for 2.6.26?
Hope so, it should go also to 25 If I remember someone posted version
that matched the old file name
as well.
Thanks
Tomas
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:47:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> FYI, I created an item in bugzilla to track this
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10765
>
> As requested, more configuration and log files have been attached
> to this item.
It looks like also this issue should be fixed by ' mac80211: reorder
channel and freq reporting in wext scan report' patch.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/15177
Please try.
Thanks
Tomas
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:47:44AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> FYI, I created an item in bugzilla to track this
> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10765
> >
> > As requested, more configuration and log files have been attached
> > to this item.
>
> It looks like also this issue should be fixed by ' mac80211: reorder
> channel and freq reporting in wext scan report' patch.
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/15177
> Please try.
> Thanks
> Tomas
I can confirm that the patch linked above has solved the regression for me.
Is it queued for 2.6.26?
--
MST