2009-02-23 21:26:45

by Carlos Mafra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: iwlagn warning in 2.6.29-rc6

I've just got this warning in my Vaio laptop:

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1254 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x28a/0x2e0()
Hardware name: VGN-FZ240E
wrong command queue 31, sequence 0x7FFF readp=241 writep=241
Modules linked in: usbhid nvram snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec uvcvideo snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlagn videodev snd_timer sky2 v4l1_compat v4l2_compat_ioctl32 evdev sg i2c_i801 snd_page_alloc sr_mod ata_piix ahci libata sd_mod scsi_mod uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29-rc6 #37
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff8023d850>] warn_slowpath+0xd0/0x130
[<ffffffff8025072d>] ? queue_work_on+0x4d/0x60
[<ffffffff802508da>] ? queue_work+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff8053bb70>] ? ieee80211_sta_rx_mgmt+0xc0/0xf0
[<ffffffff80540f45>] ? ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers+0x12c5/0x1650
[<ffffffff80233530>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x190/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8022ecc0>] ? enqueue_task+0x50/0x60
[<ffffffff8025c049>] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0
[<ffffffff80234c24>] ? find_busiest_group+0x234/0x760
[<ffffffff8041eb3a>] iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x28a/0x2e0
[<ffffffffa0124245>] iwl_rx_handle+0x115/0x4a0 [iwlagn]
[<ffffffffa01249ef>] iwl_irq_tasklet+0x41f/0xb30 [iwlagn]
[<ffffffff8025c049>] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0
[<ffffffff80242c39>] tasklet_action+0x69/0xf0
[<ffffffff80243784>] __do_softirq+0x94/0x160
[<ffffffff8020d57c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffff8020ef35>] do_softirq+0x45/0x90
[<ffffffff80243435>] irq_exit+0x75/0xa0
[<ffffffff8020f196>] do_IRQ+0x86/0x110
[<ffffffff8020ce53>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff803a0322>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2bf/0x344
[<ffffffff803a0318>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2b5/0x344
[<ffffffff802587cf>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x3f/0x80
[<ffffffff80455345>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xa5/0x100
[<ffffffff8020b492>] ? cpu_idle+0x62/0xc0
[<ffffffff80549c7c>] ? rest_init+0x5c/0x70
---[ end trace 281a546e35661751 ]---

The wireless connection still seems to be good after this (I've
found this warning after a curious look in the dmesg), but I
thought I should send the warning to lkml just in case it has
a deeper meaning to people out there.

The card is this one,
Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN Network Connection (rev 61)

I can provide the whole dmesg output if needed too.


2009-02-24 12:39:11

by Carlos Mafra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: iwlagn warning in 2.6.29-rc6

On Mon 23.Feb'09 at 14:45:06 -0800, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:26 -0800, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > I've just got this warning in my Vaio laptop:
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1254 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x28a/0x2e0()
> > Hardware name: VGN-FZ240E
> > wrong command queue 31, sequence 0x7FFF readp=241 writep=241
> > Modules linked in: usbhid nvram snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec uvcvideo snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlagn videodev snd_timer sky2 v4l1_compat v4l2_compat_ioctl32 evdev sg i2c_i801 snd_page_alloc sr_mod ata_piix ahci libata sd_mod scsi_mod uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29-rc6 #37
> > [...]
>
> This sounds like
> http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 for
> which new uCode was released to address the problem. Could you please
> try with the most recent 4965 uCode available from
> http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/?n=Downloads ?

Ok, I tried it and so far got no warnings at all.

I will keep looking the dmesg for a few days, and if you
don't hear back from me that means it is gone for good.

Thanks for your prompt answer!

2009-02-23 22:40:34

by Reinette Chatre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: iwlagn warning in 2.6.29-rc6

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:26 -0800, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> I've just got this warning in my Vaio laptop:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c:1254 iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x28a/0x2e0()
> Hardware name: VGN-FZ240E
> wrong command queue 31, sequence 0x7FFF readp=241 writep=241
> Modules linked in: usbhid nvram snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec uvcvideo snd_hwdep snd_pcm iwlagn videodev snd_timer sky2 v4l1_compat v4l2_compat_ioctl32 evdev sg i2c_i801 snd_page_alloc sr_mod ata_piix ahci libata sd_mod scsi_mod uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29-rc6 #37
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8023d850>] warn_slowpath+0xd0/0x130
> [<ffffffff8025072d>] ? queue_work_on+0x4d/0x60
> [<ffffffff802508da>] ? queue_work+0x1a/0x20
> [<ffffffff8053bb70>] ? ieee80211_sta_rx_mgmt+0xc0/0xf0
> [<ffffffff80540f45>] ? ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers+0x12c5/0x1650
> [<ffffffff80233530>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x190/0x2d0
> [<ffffffff8022ecc0>] ? enqueue_task+0x50/0x60
> [<ffffffff8025c049>] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0
> [<ffffffff80234c24>] ? find_busiest_group+0x234/0x760
> [<ffffffff8041eb3a>] iwl_tx_cmd_complete+0x28a/0x2e0
> [<ffffffffa0124245>] iwl_rx_handle+0x115/0x4a0 [iwlagn]
> [<ffffffffa01249ef>] iwl_irq_tasklet+0x41f/0xb30 [iwlagn]
> [<ffffffff8025c049>] ? getnstimeofday+0x59/0xe0
> [<ffffffff80242c39>] tasklet_action+0x69/0xf0
> [<ffffffff80243784>] __do_softirq+0x94/0x160
> [<ffffffff8020d57c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> [<ffffffff8020ef35>] do_softirq+0x45/0x90
> [<ffffffff80243435>] irq_exit+0x75/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8020f196>] do_IRQ+0x86/0x110
> [<ffffffff8020ce53>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> <EOI> [<ffffffff803a0322>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2bf/0x344
> [<ffffffff803a0318>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x2b5/0x344
> [<ffffffff802587cf>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x3f/0x80
> [<ffffffff80455345>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xa5/0x100
> [<ffffffff8020b492>] ? cpu_idle+0x62/0xc0
> [<ffffffff80549c7c>] ? rest_init+0x5c/0x70
> ---[ end trace 281a546e35661751 ]---
>
> The wireless connection still seems to be good after this (I've
> found this warning after a curious look in the dmesg), but I
> thought I should send the warning to lkml just in case it has
> a deeper meaning to people out there.
>
> The card is this one,
> Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN Network Connection (rev 61)
>
> I can provide the whole dmesg output if needed too.
> --

This sounds like
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 for
which new uCode was released to address the problem. Could you please
try with the most recent 4965 uCode available from
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/?n=Downloads ?

Reinette