2009-09-29 19:30:52

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc2: wlan rt73 dead

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:11:25PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:

> And that's it. Tha adapter is "off", and no connection is possible. It's
> strongly 2.6.32-rc2 related, no problems with any other kernel before.

Could you do a git bisect? Also, please Cc:
[email protected] for your response...

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.


2009-09-29 23:32:50

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc2: wlan rt73 dead

On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:04 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 29.09.2009, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > Could you do a git bisect?
>
> I have never used git in my whole life, but I'll read the documentation
> and try.

While it's a good skill, don't waste your time. You're running opensuse,
I suppose, and having the same problem as Hugh:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14263

Rafael: I'm pretty sure this (14272) is a dupe of 14263.

Heinz: please try a net-2.6 tree, or wait a couple of days until it's
pulled in.

johannes


Attachments:
signature.asc (801.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2009-09-29 19:57:15

by Heinz Diehl

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc2: wlan rt73 dead

On 29.09.2009, John W. Linville wrote:

> Could you do a git bisect?

I have never used git in my whole life, but I'll read the documentation
and try.


2009-09-29 23:38:16

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc2: wlan rt73 dead

On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:04 +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> > On 29.09.2009, John W. Linville wrote:
> >
> > > Could you do a git bisect?
> >
> > I have never used git in my whole life, but I'll read the documentation
> > and try.
>
> While it's a good skill, don't waste your time. You're running opensuse,
> I suppose, and having the same problem as Hugh:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14263
>
> Rafael: I'm pretty sure this (14272) is a dupe of 14263.

Thanks, marked as a duplicate and closed.

Rafael