On 24.12.2009 01:35 海藻敬之 wrote:
> ( sorry again for my last post which was corrupted. I do not why... some
> coding issue.. please be patient. )
For some reason your client tries to send the mail in UTF-16 instead of UTF-8,
so mailserver cuts the mail at the zero byte in the first character of
message body.
> My work did not include "coverage class". I just applied [3/5], [4/5].
> Before applying [4/5], ath5k_hw_clocktoh() takes care of 11a but 11g/b,
> and your new ath5k_he_get_clockrate() handles both 11a and 11b/g, correct ?
> Therefore, I thought this can make difference in throughput. am I wrong
> on this point ?
But ath5k_hw_get_clockrate() is just a dead code until [5/5] is applied, and
even after applying [5/5] it's only called on set_coverage() path, so it
couldn't make any difference in your case.
> 3Mbps/TCP is so low, isn't it ? how long is it between the two nodes ?
It's 3 megabytes per seconds, not megabits, as reported by wget. I haven't
done any real throughput test with iperf yet, so your results might be more
correct, but they shouldn't depend on my patches.
Lukas Turek