2010-05-14 17:45:09

by Nils Radtke

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock

Hi Reinette,

Might be of interest:

[63099.789939] eth1: associated
[63166.919257] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63180.322024] Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
[63190.664526] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63193.255873] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63194.941768] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63195.099286] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63196.524065] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63197.417740] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[63199.767526] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0
[63205.689184] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0
[63210.821316] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0
[63228.178530] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0

Happened on site B, with high throughput (280-340k/s). So, it's happening w/ both, fast
and slow conn speed.

Yes, I noticed and had a look into the compat-wireless scripts but preferred to do
it manually. Thank you for your explanation.

Cheers,

Nils