2011-08-31 05:17:06

by Rajkumar Manoharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] ath9k_hw: Fix rx latency of 11a mode

Rx latecy to start signal(usec) of 11a is 41 not 37 and
also corrected the rx delay in quarter rate.

Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index 3a16ba2..308847d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -975,7 +975,10 @@ void ath9k_hw_init_global_settings(struct ath_hw *ah)
if (ah->misc_mode != 0)
REG_SET_BIT(ah, AR_PCU_MISC, ah->misc_mode);

- rx_lat = 37;
+ if (IS_CHAN_A_FAST_CLOCK(ah, chan))
+ rx_lat = 41;
+ else
+ rx_lat = 37;
tx_lat = 54;

if (IS_CHAN_HALF_RATE(chan)) {
@@ -989,7 +992,7 @@ void ath9k_hw_init_global_settings(struct ath_hw *ah)
sifstime = 32;
} else if (IS_CHAN_QUARTER_RATE(chan)) {
eifs = 340;
- rx_lat *= 4;
+ rx_lat = (rx_lat * 4) - 1;
tx_lat *= 4;
if (IS_CHAN_A_FAST_CLOCK(ah, chan))
tx_lat += 22;
--
1.7.6.1



2011-08-31 18:00:23

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k_hw: Fix rx latency of 11a mode

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:47:30AM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> Rx latecy to start signal(usec) of 11a is 41 not 37 and
> also corrected the rx delay in quarter rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]>

Do you still want 'ath9k_hw: Fix slottime with coverage class" merged
as well?

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2011-09-02 09:10:28

by Rajkumar Manoharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath9k_hw: Fix rx latency of 11a mode

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:45:12PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:47:30AM +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
> > Rx latecy to start signal(usec) of 11a is 41 not 37 and
> > also corrected the rx delay in quarter rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]>
>
> Do you still want 'ath9k_hw: Fix slottime with coverage class" merged
> as well?
>
As per the comments from the Felix, it was left intentionally to improve
the throughtput. So please drop that patch.

--
Rajkumar