Greetings,
Regrettably, I found it necessary to rebase the wireless-next tree
starting from commit 94c514fe. If you maintain a tree derived from
wireless-next then you may need to adjust your tree accordingly.
I apologize for the inconvenience!
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:43:01PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> Regrettably, I found it necessary to rebase the wireless-next tree
> starting from commit 94c514fe. If you maintain a tree derived from
> wireless-next then you may need to adjust your tree accordingly.
>
> I apologize for the inconvenience!
I should note that I pulled back from net-next into wireless-next as
part of this process. This was necessary to resolve some continuing
merge issues related to the NLA_PUT_* removal. This also means that
net-next bits have made their way into wireless-testing much earlier
than they usually would have done so.
Again, I apologize for the inconvenience and/or confusion that this
might cause. Please bear through this with me.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.