From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <[email protected]>
Found this obvious typo while going through the spectral
code design in ath10k
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c
index 4671cfb..4510906 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/spectral.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ int ath10k_spectral_process_fft(struct ath10k *ar,
break;
case 80:
/* TODO: As experiments with an analogue sender and various
- * configuaritions (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
+ * configurations (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
* show, the particular configuration of 80 MHz/64 bins does
* not match with the other smaples at all. Until the reason
* for that is found, don't report these samples.
--
1.7.9.5
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:03:54AM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <[email protected]>
>
> Found this obvious typo while going through the spectral
> code design in ath10k
> /* TODO: As experiments with an analogue sender and various
> - * configuaritions (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
> + * configurations (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
> * show, the particular configuration of 80 MHz/64 bins does
> * not match with the other smaples at all. Until the reason
> * for that is found, don't report these samples.
Also "smaples" :)
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:59:59AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:03:54AM +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote:
> > From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <[email protected]>
> >
> > Found this obvious typo while going through the spectral
> > code design in ath10k
>
> > /* TODO: As experiments with an analogue sender and various
> > - * configuaritions (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
> > + * configurations (fft-sizes of 64/128/256 and 20/40/80 Mhz)
> > * show, the particular configuration of 80 MHz/64 bins does
> > * not match with the other smaples at all. Until the reason
> > * for that is found, don't report these samples.
>
> Also "smaples" :)
[shafi] goodness me will that as well !
>
> --
> Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/