I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index 8133d7b..0961a4e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ enum ath10k_pci_reset_mode {
static unsigned int ath10k_pci_irq_mode = ATH10K_PCI_IRQ_AUTO;
static unsigned int ath10k_pci_reset_mode = ATH10K_PCI_RESET_AUTO;
-module_param_named(irq_mode, ath10k_pci_irq_mode, uint, 0644);
+module_param_named(irq_mode, ath10k_pci_irq_mode, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq_mode, "0: auto, 1: legacy, 2: msi (default: 0)");
-module_param_named(reset_mode, ath10k_pci_reset_mode, uint, 0644);
+module_param_named(reset_mode, ath10k_pci_reset_mode, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(reset_mode, "0: auto, 1: warm only (default: 0)");
/* how long wait to wait for target to initialise, in ms */
--
2.9.2