I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c
index 31baca41..d543a78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/sw.c
@@ -420,11 +420,11 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek 8192S/8191S 802.11n PCI wireless");
MODULE_FIRMWARE("rtlwifi/rtl8192sefw.bin");
-module_param_named(swenc, rtl92se_mod_params.sw_crypto, bool, 0444);
-module_param_named(debug, rtl92se_mod_params.debug, int, 0444);
-module_param_named(ips, rtl92se_mod_params.inactiveps, bool, 0444);
-module_param_named(swlps, rtl92se_mod_params.swctrl_lps, bool, 0444);
-module_param_named(fwlps, rtl92se_mod_params.fwctrl_lps, bool, 0444);
+module_param_named(swenc, rtl92se_mod_params.sw_crypto, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_named(debug, rtl92se_mod_params.debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_named(ips, rtl92se_mod_params.inactiveps, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_named(swlps, rtl92se_mod_params.swctrl_lps, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_named(fwlps, rtl92se_mod_params.fwctrl_lps, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(swenc, "Set to 1 for software crypto (default 0)\n");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ips, "Set to 0 to not use link power save (default 1)\n");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(swlps, "Set to 1 to use SW control power save (default 1)\n");
--
2.9.2