From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:50:05 +0200
Two update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.
Markus Elfring (2):
Improve a size determination in four functions
Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in digital_in_send()
net/nfc/digital_core.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.13.0
From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:24:24 +0200
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LCJ16-Refactor_Strings-WSang_0.pdf
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
net/nfc/digital_core.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 3baf91f3ef80..8e02a3e1b319 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -710,7 +710,5 @@ static int digital_in_send(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, struct nfc_target *target,
- if (!data_exch) {
- pr_err("Failed to allocate data_exch struct\n");
+ if (!data_exch)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
data_exch->cb = cb;
data_exch->cb_context = cb_context;
--
2.13.0
From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:11:01 +0200
Replace the specification of four data structures by pointer dereferences
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
net/nfc/digital_core.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 0fd5518bf252..3baf91f3ef80 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -240,5 +240,5 @@ int digital_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u8 cmd_type,
{
struct digital_cmd *cmd;
- cmd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct digital_cmd), GFP_KERNEL);
+ cmd = kzalloc(sizeof(*cmd), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cmd)
@@ -287,5 +287,5 @@ static int digital_tg_listen_mdaa(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u8 rf_tech)
{
struct digital_tg_mdaa_params *params;
- params = kzalloc(sizeof(struct digital_tg_mdaa_params), GFP_KERNEL);
+ params = kzalloc(sizeof(*params), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!params)
@@ -706,5 +706,5 @@ static int digital_in_send(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, struct nfc_target *target,
struct digital_data_exch *data_exch;
int rc;
- data_exch = kzalloc(sizeof(struct digital_data_exch), GFP_KERNEL);
+ data_exch = kzalloc(sizeof(*data_exch), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!data_exch) {
@@ -764,5 +764,5 @@ struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
!ops->switch_rf || (ops->tg_listen_md && !ops->tg_get_rf_tech))
return NULL;
- ddev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nfc_digital_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ddev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ddev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ddev)
--
2.13.0
Hi Markus,
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:57:42PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:50:05 +0200
>
> Two update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (2):
> Improve a size determination in four functions
> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in digital_in_send()
Both patches applied to nfc-next, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.