Hi
The content of db.txt for Denmark (DK) is wrong. The 5GHz is from some
where between 2002-2006, and the 2.4GHz has never been correct.
Current content of db.txt:
--------------------------
country DK: DFS-ETSI
(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
(5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW
(5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW
(5490 - 5710 @ 160), (27), DFS
# 60 GHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567
(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
Current free channels Denmark:
------------------------------
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
5725,0-5875,0 MHz
57-66 GHz
I suggest to copy the rules for Germany (DE) to Denmark (DK):
-------------------------------------------------------------
country DK: DFS-ETSI
(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW)
(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
(5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS
# short range devices (ETSI EN 300 440-1)
(5725 - 5875 @ 80), (25 mW)
# 60 GHz band channels 1-4 (ETSI EN 302 567)
(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
History of free channels Denmark:
---------------------------------
From 1999-09-07:
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5250,0 MHz
From 2000-03-30
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
From 2002-12-10
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
17,1-17,3 GHz
From 2006-11-07
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
5725,0-5925,0 MHz
17,1-17,3 GHz
From 2007-09-20
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
5725,0-5875,0 MHz
17,1-17,3 GHz
From 2008-06-11
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
5725,0-5875,0 MHz
From 2009-11-27 (current)
2400,0-2483,5 MHz
5150,0-5350,0 MHz
5470,0-5725,0 MHz
5725,0-5875,0 MHz
57-66 GHz
Source (search for "RLAN"):
https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=189932
--
Per Mejdal Rasmussen
http://personprofil.aau.dk/109070
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 03:48:12PM +0100, Per Mejdal Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have taken the time research which frequencies and power levels are
> allowed for WiFi in Denmark. So db.txt for wireless-regdb can be updated.
Thanks for this information. I know I've been slow to respond, but
there's no need to keep resending them. I've been looking through the
documents trying to validate the changes you suggested, but my time for
doing so has been limited so I haven't finished yet. I hope to be able
to send a detailed response soon.
Thanks,
Seth