From: Wen Huang <[email protected]>
add_ie_rates() copys rates without checking the length
in bss descriptor from remote AP.when victim connects to
remote attacker, this may trigger buffer overflow.
lbs_ibss_join_existing() copys rates without checking the length
in bss descriptor from remote IBSS node.when victim connects to
remote attacker, this may trigger buffer overflow.
Fix them by putting the length check before performing copy.
This fix addresses CVE-2019-14896 and CVE-2019-14897.
This also fix build warning of mixed declarations and code.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wen Huang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c
index 57edfada0..c9401c121 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/cfg.c
@@ -273,6 +273,10 @@ add_ie_rates(u8 *tlv, const u8 *ie, int *nrates)
int hw, ap, ap_max = ie[1];
u8 hw_rate;
+ if (ap_max > MAX_RATES) {
+ lbs_deb_assoc("invalid rates\n");
+ return tlv;
+ }
/* Advance past IE header */
ie += 2;
@@ -1717,6 +1721,9 @@ static int lbs_ibss_join_existing(struct lbs_private *priv,
struct cmd_ds_802_11_ad_hoc_join cmd;
u8 preamble = RADIO_PREAMBLE_SHORT;
int ret = 0;
+ int hw, i;
+ u8 rates_max;
+ u8 *rates;
/* TODO: set preamble based on scan result */
ret = lbs_set_radio(priv, preamble, 1);
@@ -1775,9 +1782,12 @@ static int lbs_ibss_join_existing(struct lbs_private *priv,
if (!rates_eid) {
lbs_add_rates(cmd.bss.rates);
} else {
- int hw, i;
- u8 rates_max = rates_eid[1];
- u8 *rates = cmd.bss.rates;
+ rates_max = rates_eid[1];
+ if (rates_max > MAX_RATES) {
+ lbs_deb_join("invalid rates");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ rates = cmd.bss.rates;
for (hw = 0; hw < ARRAY_SIZE(lbs_rates); hw++) {
u8 hw_rate = lbs_rates[hw].bitrate / 5;
for (i = 0; i < rates_max; i++) {
--
2.17.1
Wen Huang <[email protected]> writes:
> I have modified the patch and submmit:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11265751/
Thanks, but few tips for the future (no need to resend because of
these):
* don't use HTML in email
* use v2, v3 and so on to identify the version of the patch
* do not top post
More info in the link below, I suggest to carefully study that. Better
chances of getting your patches accepted that way.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches