Using mdelay() can work well, but calibration causes too much time. Use
proper udelay() to get shorter time and the same result.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
index 1e67a565a9e0c..b0672b906e7bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c
@@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ static u8 _dpk_one_shot(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw89_phy_read32_mask, val, val == 0x55,
10, 20000, false, rtwdev, 0xbff8, MASKBYTE0);
- mdelay(10);
+ udelay(10);
rtw89_phy_write32_clr(rtwdev, R_NCTL_N1, MASKBYTE0);
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
--
2.25.1