This driver is attempting to register to support two different buses.
if either of these is successful then ath10k_pci_init() should return 0
so that hardware attached to the successful bus can be probed and
supported. only if both of these are unsuccessful should ath10k_pci_init()
return an errno.
Fixes: 0b523ced9a3c ("ath10k: add basic skeleton to support ahb")
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <[email protected]>
---
v2: modify according to Jeff's suggestion, and change the commit message
and body as well.
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index e56c6a6b1379..728d607289c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -3792,18 +3792,22 @@ static struct pci_driver ath10k_pci_driver = {
static int __init ath10k_pci_init(void)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret1, ret2;
- ret = pci_register_driver(&ath10k_pci_driver);
- if (ret)
+ ret1 = pci_register_driver(&ath10k_pci_driver);
+ if (ret1)
printk(KERN_ERR "failed to register ath10k pci driver: %d\n",
- ret);
+ ret1);
- ret = ath10k_ahb_init();
- if (ret)
- printk(KERN_ERR "ahb init failed: %d\n", ret);
+ ret2 = ath10k_ahb_init();
+ if (ret2)
+ printk(KERN_ERR "ahb init failed: %d\n", ret2);
- return ret;
+ if (ret1 && ret2)
+ return ret1;
+
+ /* registered to at least one bus */
+ return 0;
}
module_init(ath10k_pci_init);
--
2.17.1
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:12:28 +0800 Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> CC: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
How did you come up with this CC list? If you're CCing netdev
maintainers you should also CC [email protected]
Somehow you managed to CC LMKL but not netdev :S
?? 2022/11/10 11:25, Jakub Kicinski ะด??:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:12:28 +0800 Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
>> CC: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
>
> How did you come up with this CC list? If you're CCing netdev
> maintainers you should also CC [email protected]
> Somehow you managed to CC LMKL but not netdev :S
> .
Sorry, I may missed that, I will resend this patch.
>