2023-01-06 12:11:21

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: third patchset to adopt BTC version

This patchset is continue to adopt BTC version to coexistence, and
dependency is the second patchset
"wifi: rtw89: coex: second patchset to adopt BTC version"

Ching-Te Ku (7):
wifi: rtw89: coex: Add version code for Wi-Fi firmware coexistence
control
wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi Null data report to version separate
wifi: rtw89: coex: Change firmware steps report to version separate
wifi: rtw89: coex: refactor debug log of slot list
wifi: rtw89: coex: Packet traffic arbitration hardware owner monitor
wifi: rtw89: coex: Change RTL8852B use v1 TDMA policy
wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi role info related logic to version
separate

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 272 +++++++++++-------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 58 +++-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c | 11 +-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)

--
2.25.1


2023-01-06 12:11:21

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Packet traffic arbitration hardware owner monitor

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

Because the difference of the hardware design, RTL8852C can not get the
PTA owner by the same method with RTL8852B, RTL8852A. Modify the get owner
API and related logic.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 7 ++-----
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c | 11 +++++++++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 03872ac8cced0..ec31dd0751cee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -4873,7 +4873,7 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_init(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 mode)
_write_scbd(rtwdev,
BTC_WSCB_ACTIVE | BTC_WSCB_ON | BTC_WSCB_BTLOG, true);
_update_bt_scbd(rtwdev, true);
- if (rtw89_mac_get_ctrl_path(rtwdev) && chip->chip_id == RTL8852A) {
+ if (rtw89_mac_get_ctrl_path(rtwdev)) {
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): PTA owner warning!!\n",
__func__);
@@ -7082,10 +7082,7 @@ static void _show_mreg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)

/* To avoid I/O if WL LPS or power-off */
if (!wl->status.map.lps && !wl->status.map.rf_off) {
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
- btc->dm.pta_owner = rtw89_mac_get_ctrl_path(rtwdev);
- else if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852C)
- btc->dm.pta_owner = 0;
+ btc->dm.pta_owner = rtw89_mac_get_ctrl_path(rtwdev);

_get_gnt(rtwdev, &gnt_cfg);
gnt = gnt_cfg.band[0];
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
index cf9a0a3120a79..5ab0590485e0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c
@@ -4865,9 +4865,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw89_mac_cfg_ctrl_path_v1);

bool rtw89_mac_get_ctrl_path(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
- u8 val = rtw89_read8(rtwdev, R_AX_SYS_SDIO_CTRL + 3);
+ const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
+ u8 val = 0;
+
+ if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852C)
+ return false;
+ else if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A || chip->chip_id == RTL8852B)
+ val = rtw89_read8_mask(rtwdev, R_AX_SYS_SDIO_CTRL + 3,
+ B_AX_LTE_MUX_CTRL_PATH >> 24);

- return FIELD_GET(B_AX_LTE_MUX_CTRL_PATH >> 24, val);
+ return !!val;
}

u16 rtw89_mac_get_plt_cnt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 band)
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:21

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi role info related logic to version separate

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

The Wi-Fi role info structure will need to H2C to firmware, firmware
need these information to do some multi-role operation. v1 add DBCC
and NOA information in the structure. And driver side also need to
put/get values at the corresponding version of structure.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 39 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index ec31dd0751cee..d48ae25823ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -2075,6 +2075,7 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
struct rtw89_btc_bt_info *bt = &btc->cx.bt;
struct rtw89_btc_bt_link_info *b = &bt->link_info;
@@ -2088,7 +2089,7 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
if (btc->ctrl.manual || wl->status.map.scan)
return;

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A) {
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0) {
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
connect_cnt = wl_rinfo->connect_cnt;
} else {
@@ -2107,13 +2108,13 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
r = &wl_rinfo->active_role[i];
r1 = &wl_rinfo_v1->active_role_v1[i];

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A &&
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0 &&
(r->role == RTW89_WIFI_ROLE_P2P_GO ||
r->role == RTW89_WIFI_ROLE_P2P_CLIENT)) {
ch = r->ch;
bw = r->bw;
break;
- } else if (chip->chip_id != RTL8852A &&
+ } else if (ver->fwlrole == 1 &&
(r1->role == RTW89_WIFI_ROLE_P2P_GO ||
r1->role == RTW89_WIFI_ROLE_P2P_CLIENT)) {
ch = r1->ch;
@@ -2128,12 +2129,12 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
r = &wl_rinfo->active_role[i];
r1 = &wl_rinfo_v1->active_role_v1[i];

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A &&
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0 &&
r->connected && r->band == RTW89_BAND_2G) {
ch = r->ch;
bw = r->bw;
break;
- } else if (chip->chip_id != RTL8852A &&
+ } else if (ver->fwlrole == 1 &&
r1->connected && r1->band == RTW89_BAND_2G) {
ch = r1->ch;
bw = r1->bw;
@@ -3581,8 +3582,8 @@ static void _action_wl_rfk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)

static void _set_btg_ctrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info *wl_rinfo = &wl->role_info;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info_v1 *wl_rinfo_v1 = &wl->role_info_v1;
@@ -3593,7 +3594,7 @@ static void _set_btg_ctrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
if (btc->ctrl.manual)
return;

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
else
mode = wl_rinfo_v1->link_mode;
@@ -3686,8 +3687,8 @@ static void rtw89_tx_time_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta)

static void _set_wl_tx_limit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_cx *cx = &btc->cx;
struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &cx->wl;
@@ -3707,7 +3708,7 @@ static void _set_wl_tx_limit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
if (btc->ctrl.manual)
return;

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
else
mode = wl_rinfo_v1->link_mode;
@@ -3755,8 +3756,8 @@ static void _set_wl_tx_limit(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)

static void _set_bt_rx_agc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info *wl_rinfo = &wl->role_info;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info_v1 *wl_rinfo_v1 = &wl->role_info_v1;
@@ -3764,7 +3765,7 @@ static void _set_bt_rx_agc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
bool bt_hi_lna_rx = false;
u8 mode;

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
else
mode = wl_rinfo_v1->link_mode;
@@ -4628,8 +4629,8 @@ static bool _chk_wl_rfk_request(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
static
void _run_coex(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum btc_reason_and_action reason)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &rtwdev->btc.dm;
struct rtw89_btc_cx *cx = &btc->cx;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
@@ -4644,7 +4645,7 @@ void _run_coex(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum btc_reason_and_action reason)
_update_dm_step(rtwdev, reason);
_update_btc_state_map(rtwdev);

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
else
mode = wl_rinfo_v1->link_mode;
@@ -4766,9 +4767,9 @@ void _run_coex(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum btc_reason_and_action reason)
break;
case BTC_WLINK_2G_SCC:
bt->scan_rx_low_pri = true;
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
_action_wl_2g_scc(rtwdev);
- else if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852C)
+ else if (ver->fwlrole == 1)
_action_wl_2g_scc_v1(rtwdev);
break;
case BTC_WLINK_2G_MCC:
@@ -5206,10 +5207,10 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_role_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif
struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta, enum btc_role_state state)
{
const struct rtw89_chan *chan = rtw89_chan_get(rtwdev, RTW89_SUB_ENTITY_0);
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct ieee80211_vif *vif = rtwvif_to_vif(rtwvif);
struct ieee80211_sta *sta = rtwsta_to_sta(rtwsta);
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &btc->cx.wl;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_link_info r = {0};
struct rtw89_btc_wl_link_info *wlinfo = NULL;
@@ -5273,7 +5274,7 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_role_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif
wlinfo = &wl->link_info[r.pid];

memcpy(wlinfo, &r, sizeof(*wlinfo));
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
_update_wl_info(rtwdev);
else
_update_wl_info_v1(rtwdev);
@@ -5789,8 +5790,8 @@ static void _show_wl_role_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)

static void _show_wl_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_cx *cx = &btc->cx;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &cx->wl;
struct rtw89_btc_wl_role_info *wl_rinfo = &wl->role_info;
@@ -5802,7 +5803,7 @@ static void _show_wl_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)

seq_puts(m, "========== [WL Status] ==========\n");

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fwlrole == 0)
mode = wl_rinfo->link_mode;
else
mode = wl_rinfo_v1->link_mode;
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:23

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Change firmware steps report to version separate

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

The report records the slots/events and their time cost about the code
call flow at firmware, ver 3 assign a reserved variable to recognize
the report is enabled or not. And add corresponding function to parsing
the report.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 44 ++++++--
2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index eec1f5228c5dc..5979efb5e465d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -923,7 +923,6 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo,
u8 *prptbuf, u32 index)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
@@ -1017,16 +1016,18 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
break;
case BTC_RPT_TYPE_STEP:
pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.cinfo;
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A) {
- pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo;
- pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.step[0]) *
+ if (ver->fcxstep == 2) {
+ pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v2;
+ pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v2.step[0]) *
trace_step +
- offsetof(struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps, step);
- } else {
- pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo_v1;
- pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo_v1.step[0]) *
+ offsetof(struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v2, step);
+ } else if (ver->fcxstep == 3) {
+ pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v3;
+ pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v3.step[0]) *
trace_step +
- offsetof(struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v1, step);
+ offsetof(struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v3, step);
+ } else {
+ goto err;
}
pcinfo->req_fver = ver->fcxstep;
break;
@@ -6008,6 +6009,7 @@ static void _show_bt_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
#define CASE_BTC_POLICY_STR(e) \
case BTC_CXP_ ## e | BTC_POLICY_EXT_BIT: return #e
#define CASE_BTC_SLOT_STR(e) case CXST_ ## e: return #e
+#define CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(e) case CXEVNT_## e: return #e

static const char *steps_to_str(u16 step)
{
@@ -6148,6 +6150,40 @@ static const char *id_to_slot(u32 id)
}
}

+static const char *id_to_evt(u32 id)
+{
+ switch (id) {
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(TDMA_ENTRY);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(WL_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B1_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B2_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B3_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B4_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(W2B_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B2W_TMR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(BCN_EARLY);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(A2DP_EMPTY);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(LK_END);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(RX_ISR);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(RX_FC0);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(RX_FC1);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(BT_RELINK);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(BT_RETRY);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(E2G);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(E5G);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(EBT);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(ENULL);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(DRV_WLK);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(BCN_OK);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(BT_CHANGE);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(EBT_EXTEND);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(E2G_NULL1);
+ CASE_BTC_EVT_STR(B1FDD_TMR);
+ default:
+ return "unknown";
+ }
+}
+
static
void seq_print_segment(struct seq_file *m, const char *prefix, u16 *data,
u8 len, u8 seg_len, u8 start_idx, u8 ring_len)
@@ -6857,12 +6893,12 @@ static void _show_fbtc_nullsta(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}

-static void _show_fbtc_step(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
+static void _show_fbtc_step_v2(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
{
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo = NULL;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps *pstep = NULL;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v2 *pstep = NULL;
u8 type, val, cnt = 0, state = 0;
bool outloop = false;
u16 i, diff_t, n_start = 0, n_stop = 0;
@@ -6872,7 +6908,7 @@ static void _show_fbtc_step(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
if (!pcinfo->valid)
return;

- pstep = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo;
+ pstep = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v2;
pos_old = le16_to_cpu(pstep->pos_old);
pos_new = le16_to_cpu(pstep->pos_new);

@@ -6926,6 +6962,63 @@ static void _show_fbtc_step(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
} while (!outloop);
}

+static void _show_fbtc_step_v3(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
+{
+ struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
+ struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v3 *pstep;
+ u32 i, n_begin, n_end, array_idx, cnt = 0;
+ u8 type, val;
+ u16 diff_t;
+
+ if ((pfwinfo->rpt_en_map &
+ rtw89_btc_fw_rpt_ver(rtwdev, RPT_EN_FW_STEP_INFO)) == 0)
+ return;
+
+ pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.cinfo;
+ if (!pcinfo->valid)
+ return;
+
+ pstep = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_step.finfo.v3;
+ if (pcinfo->req_fver != pstep->fver)
+ return;
+
+ if (le32_to_cpu(pstep->cnt) <= FCXDEF_STEP)
+ n_begin = 1;
+ else
+ n_begin = le32_to_cpu(pstep->cnt) - FCXDEF_STEP + 1;
+
+ n_end = le32_to_cpu(pstep->cnt);
+
+ if (n_begin > n_end)
+ return;
+
+ /* restore step info by using ring instead of FIFO */
+ for (i = n_begin; i <= n_end; i++) {
+ array_idx = (i - 1) % FCXDEF_STEP;
+ type = pstep->step[array_idx].type;
+ val = pstep->step[array_idx].val;
+ diff_t = le16_to_cpu(pstep->step[array_idx].difft);
+
+ if (type == CXSTEP_NONE || type >= CXSTEP_MAX)
+ continue;
+
+ if (cnt % 10 == 0)
+ seq_printf(m, " %-15s : ", "[steps]");
+
+ seq_printf(m, "-> %s(%02d)",
+ (type == CXSTEP_SLOT ?
+ id_to_slot((u32)val) :
+ id_to_evt((u32)val)), diff_t);
+
+ if (cnt % 10 == 9)
+ seq_puts(m, "\n");
+
+ cnt++;
+ }
+}
+
static void _show_fw_dm_msg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
{
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
@@ -6946,7 +7039,12 @@ static void _show_fw_dm_msg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
_show_fbtc_cysta_v4(rtwdev, m);

_show_fbtc_nullsta(rtwdev, m);
- _show_fbtc_step(rtwdev, m);
+
+ if (ver->fcxstep == 2)
+ _show_fbtc_step_v2(rtwdev, m);
+ else if (ver->fcxstep == 3)
+ _show_fbtc_step_v3(rtwdev, m);
+
}

static void _get_gnt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_mac_ax_coex_gnt *gnt_cfg)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index dfde8801e97bb..39c5a003e36cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -1611,6 +1611,36 @@ enum rtw89_btc_cxst_state {
CXST_MAX = 0x12,
};

+enum rtw89_btc_cxevnt {
+ CXEVNT_TDMA_ENTRY = 0x0,
+ CXEVNT_WL_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_B1_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_B2_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_B3_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_B4_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_W2B_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_B2W_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_BCN_EARLY,
+ CXEVNT_A2DP_EMPTY,
+ CXEVNT_LK_END,
+ CXEVNT_RX_ISR,
+ CXEVNT_RX_FC0,
+ CXEVNT_RX_FC1,
+ CXEVNT_BT_RELINK,
+ CXEVNT_BT_RETRY,
+ CXEVNT_E2G,
+ CXEVNT_E5G,
+ CXEVNT_EBT,
+ CXEVNT_ENULL,
+ CXEVNT_DRV_WLK,
+ CXEVNT_BCN_OK,
+ CXEVNT_BT_CHANGE,
+ CXEVNT_EBT_EXTEND,
+ CXEVNT_E2G_NULL1,
+ CXEVNT_B1FDD_TMR,
+ CXEVNT_MAX
+};
+
enum {
CXBCN_ALL = 0x0,
CXBCN_ALL_OK,
@@ -1696,7 +1726,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_step {
__le16 difft;
} __packed;

-struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps {
+struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v2 {
u8 fver; /* btc_ver::fcxstep */
u8 rsvd;
__le16 cnt;
@@ -1705,7 +1735,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps {
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_step step[FCXMAX_STEP];
} __packed;

-struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v1 {
+struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v3 {
u8 fver;
u8 en;
__le16 rsvd;
@@ -1713,6 +1743,11 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v1 {
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_step step[FCXMAX_STEP];
} __packed;

+union rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_info {
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v2 v2;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v3 v3;
+};
+
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cysta_v2 { /* statistics for cycles */
u8 fver; /* btc_ver::fcxcysta */
u8 rsvd;
@@ -2072,10 +2107,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_cysta {

struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_step {
struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info cinfo; /* common info, by driver */
- union {
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps finfo; /* info from fw */
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_v1 finfo_v1; /* info from fw */
- };
+ union rtw89_btc_fbtc_steps_info finfo; /* info from fw */
};

struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_nullsta {
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:27

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Change RTL8852B use v1 TDMA policy

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

RTL8852B support the new features like TDMA instant (Change TDMA mechanism
immediately), Co-RX feature (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth can RX in the same time) and
so on. The v1 TDMA policy will enable those newer mechanism. It will have
a better coexistence performance.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
index b9e5363e524b3..e0f6dfe31bddd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
@@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ static const struct rtw89_chip_ops rtw8852b_chip_ops = {
.btc_update_bt_cnt = rtw8852b_btc_update_bt_cnt,
.btc_wl_s1_standby = rtw8852b_btc_wl_s1_standby,
.btc_set_wl_rx_gain = rtw8852b_btc_set_wl_rx_gain,
- .btc_set_policy = rtw89_btc_set_policy,
+ .btc_set_policy = rtw89_btc_set_policy_v1,
};

const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852b_chip_info = {
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:27

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: refactor debug log of slot list

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

Slot list is to list the WiFi/Bluetooth PTA hardware priority setting.
Move the list parser to its function, not to append together with TDMA
parser.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 45 +++--------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 5979efb5e465d..03872ac8cced0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -6345,9 +6345,6 @@ static void _show_fbtc_tdma(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo = NULL;
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_tdma *t = NULL;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot *s = NULL;
- struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
- u8 i, cnt = 0;

pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_tdma.cinfo;
if (!pcinfo->valid)
@@ -6373,61 +6370,29 @@ static void _show_fbtc_tdma(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
"policy_type:%d",
(u32)btc->policy_type);

- s = pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_slots.finfo.slot;
-
- for (i = 0; i < CXST_MAX; i++) {
- if (dm->update_slot_map == BIT(CXST_MAX) - 1)
- break;
-
- if (!(dm->update_slot_map & BIT(i)))
- continue;
-
- if (cnt % 6 == 0)
- seq_printf(m,
- " %-15s : %d[%d/0x%x/%d]",
- "[slot_policy]",
- (u32)i,
- s[i].dur, s[i].cxtbl, s[i].cxtype);
- else
- seq_printf(m,
- ", %d[%d/0x%x/%d]",
- (u32)i,
- s[i].dur, s[i].cxtbl, s[i].cxtype);
- if (cnt % 6 == 5)
- seq_puts(m, "\n");
- cnt++;
- }
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}

static void _show_fbtc_slots(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
{
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
- struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
- struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo = NULL;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slots *pslots = NULL;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot s;
+ struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_slot *s;
u8 i = 0;

- pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_slots.cinfo;
- if (!pcinfo->valid)
- return;
-
- pslots = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_slots.finfo;
-
for (i = 0; i < CXST_MAX; i++) {
- s = pslots->slot[i];
+ s = &dm->slot_now[i];
if (i % 6 == 0)
seq_printf(m,
" %-15s : %02d[%03d/0x%x/%d]",
"[slot_list]",
(u32)i,
- s.dur, s.cxtbl, s.cxtype);
+ s->dur, s->cxtbl, s->cxtype);
else
seq_printf(m,
", %02d[%03d/0x%x/%d]",
(u32)i,
- s.dur, s.cxtbl, s.cxtype);
+ s->dur, s->cxtbl, s->cxtype);
if (i % 6 == 5)
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:27

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi Null data report to version separate

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

Coexistence need to send Null data to stop AP keeps TX packet to DUT
before DUT coexistence switch to Bluetooth time slot, or it will be an
interference to DUT BT and because DUT will not RX packet from AP
the packet retry may harmful to WL TP. Compare to v1 version, the newer
firmware report will also report Null TX data counter.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 57 +++++++++++------------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 14 +++---
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index f97ddbcb51046..eec1f5228c5dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -1032,12 +1032,14 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
break;
case BTC_RPT_TYPE_NULLSTA:
pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.cinfo;
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A) {
+ if (ver->fcxnullsta == 1) {
pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo;
- pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo);
+ pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v1);
+ } else if (ver->fcxnullsta == 2) {
+ pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v2;
+ pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo.v2);
} else {
- pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo_v1;
- pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo_v1);
+ goto err;
}
pcinfo->req_fver = ver->fcxnullsta;
break;
@@ -6789,12 +6791,11 @@ static void _show_fbtc_cysta_v4(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)

static void _show_fbtc_nullsta(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta *ns;
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 *ns_v1;
+ union rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_info *ns;
u8 i = 0;

if (!btc->dm.tdma_now.rxflctrl)
@@ -6804,9 +6805,8 @@ static void _show_fbtc_nullsta(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
if (!pcinfo->valid)
return;

- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A) {
- ns = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo;
-
+ ns = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo;
+ if (ver->fcxnullsta == 1) {
seq_printf(m, " %-15s : ", "[null_sta]");

for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
@@ -6815,46 +6815,43 @@ static void _show_fbtc_nullsta(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
else
seq_printf(m, "null-%d", i);
seq_printf(m, "[ok:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->result[i][1]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.result[i][1]));
seq_printf(m, "fail:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->result[i][0]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.result[i][0]));
seq_printf(m, "on_time:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->result[i][2]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.result[i][2]));
seq_printf(m, "retry:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->result[i][3]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.result[i][3]));
seq_printf(m, "avg_t:%d.%03d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->avg_t[i]) / 1000,
- le32_to_cpu(ns->avg_t[i]) % 1000);
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.avg_t[i]) / 1000,
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.avg_t[i]) % 1000);
seq_printf(m, "max_t:%d.%03d]",
- le32_to_cpu(ns->max_t[i]) / 1000,
- le32_to_cpu(ns->max_t[i]) % 1000);
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.max_t[i]) / 1000,
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v1.max_t[i]) % 1000);
}
} else {
- ns_v1 = &pfwinfo->rpt_fbtc_nullsta.finfo_v1;
-
seq_printf(m, " %-15s : ", "[null_sta]");
-
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
if (i != 0)
seq_printf(m, ", null-%d", i);
else
seq_printf(m, "null-%d", i);
seq_printf(m, "[Tx:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->result[i][4]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.result[i][4]));
seq_printf(m, "[ok:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->result[i][1]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.result[i][1]));
seq_printf(m, "fail:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->result[i][0]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.result[i][0]));
seq_printf(m, "on_time:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->result[i][2]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.result[i][2]));
seq_printf(m, "retry:%d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->result[i][3]));
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.result[i][3]));
seq_printf(m, "avg_t:%d.%03d/",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->avg_t[i]) / 1000,
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->avg_t[i]) % 1000);
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.avg_t[i]) / 1000,
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.avg_t[i]) % 1000);
seq_printf(m, "max_t:%d.%03d]",
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->max_t[i]) / 1000,
- le32_to_cpu(ns_v1->max_t[i]) % 1000);
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.max_t[i]) / 1000,
+ le32_to_cpu(ns->v2.max_t[i]) % 1000);
}
}
seq_puts(m, "\n");
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index d0b4c00324572..dfde8801e97bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ union rtw89_btc_fbtc_cysta_info {
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cysta_v4 v4;
};

-struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta { /* cycle null statistics */
+struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 { /* cycle null statistics */
u8 fver; /* btc_ver::fcxnullsta */
u8 rsvd;
__le16 rsvd2;
@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta { /* cycle null statistics */
__le32 result[2][4]; /* 0:fail, 1:ok, 2:on_time, 3:retry */
} __packed;

-struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 { /* cycle null statistics */
+struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v2 { /* cycle null statistics */
u8 fver; /* btc_ver::fcxnullsta */
u8 rsvd;
__le16 rsvd2;
@@ -1883,6 +1883,11 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 { /* cycle null statistics */
__le32 result[2][5]; /* 0:fail, 1:ok, 2:on_time, 3:retry, 4:tx */
} __packed;

+union rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_info {
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 v1; /* info from fw */
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v2 v2;
+};
+
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_btver {
u8 fver; /* btc_ver::fcxbtver */
u8 rsvd;
@@ -2075,10 +2080,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_step {

struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_nullsta {
struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info cinfo; /* common info, by driver */
- union {
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta finfo; /* info from fw */
- struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_v1 finfo_v1; /* info from fw */
- };
+ union rtw89_btc_fbtc_cynullsta_info finfo;
};

struct rtw89_btc_rpt_fbtc_mreg {
--
2.25.1

2023-01-06 12:11:27

by Ping-Ke Shih

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add version code for Wi-Fi firmware coexistence control

From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>

The newer Wi-Fi firmware are all changed to "Not to send H2C to
mention firmware how many call flow step should firmware trace".
The structure had removed the member, and define the steps number
at newer version firmware.

Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 19a49ef243fa4..543c10b8349d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -1992,8 +1992,8 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_cxdrv_role_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
#define H2C_LEN_CXDRVINFO_CTRL (4 + H2C_LEN_CXDRVHDR)
int rtw89_fw_h2c_cxdrv_ctrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
{
- const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver = btc->ver;
struct rtw89_btc_ctrl *ctrl = &btc->ctrl;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u8 *cmd;
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_cxdrv_ctrl(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
RTW89_SET_FWCMD_CXCTRL_MANUAL(cmd, ctrl->manual);
RTW89_SET_FWCMD_CXCTRL_IGNORE_BT(cmd, ctrl->igno_bt);
RTW89_SET_FWCMD_CXCTRL_ALWAYS_FREERUN(cmd, ctrl->always_freerun);
- if (chip->chip_id == RTL8852A)
+ if (ver->fcxctrl == 0)
RTW89_SET_FWCMD_CXCTRL_TRACE_STEP(cmd, ctrl->trace_step);

rtw89_h2c_pkt_set_hdr(rtwdev, skb, FWCMD_TYPE_H2C,
--
2.25.1

2023-01-16 13:43:14

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add version code for Wi-Fi firmware coexistence control

Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
>
> The newer Wi-Fi firmware are all changed to "Not to send H2C to
> mention firmware how many call flow step should firmware trace".
> The structure had removed the member, and define the steps number
> at newer version firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>

7 patches applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

72f8b0461b4a wifi: rtw89: coex: Add version code for Wi-Fi firmware coexistence control
3d929f075d3b wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi Null data report to version separate
2626ccefe615 wifi: rtw89: coex: Change firmware steps report to version separate
2ce43be34850 wifi: rtw89: coex: refactor debug log of slot list
ae4e1adbb1be wifi: rtw89: coex: Packet traffic arbitration hardware owner monitor
447a3267cbed wifi: rtw89: coex: Change RTL8852B use v1 TDMA policy
fbc2caf19914 wifi: rtw89: coex: Change Wi-Fi role info related logic to version separate

--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches