On 2/7/2022 12:24 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> I've changed *STAT_* macros a bit in previous patch and I seems like
> they become really unreadable. Align these macros definitions to make
> code cleaner.
>
> Also fixed following checkpatch warning
>
> ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes since v2:
> - My send-email script forgot, that mailing lists exist.
> Added back all related lists
> - Fixed checkpatch warning
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Added this patch
>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
> index 141642e5e00d..b4755e21a501 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
> @@ -327,14 +327,14 @@ static inline struct ath9k_htc_tx_ctl *HTC_SKB_CB(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC_DEBUGFS
> -#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0)
> -#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++)
> -#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a)
> -#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++)
> -#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a)
> -#define CAB_STAT_INC priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++
> -
> -#define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++)
> +#define __STAT_SAVE(expr) (hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv ? (expr) : 0)
> +#define TX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c++)
> +#define TX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.tx_stats.c += a)
> +#define RX_STAT_INC(c) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c++)
> +#define RX_STAT_ADD(c, a) __STAT_SAVE(hif_dev->htc_handle->drv_priv->debug.skbrx_stats.c += a)
> +#define CAB_STAT_INC (priv->debug.tx_stats.cab_queued++)
> +
> +#define TX_QSTAT_INC(q) (priv->debug.tx_stats.queue_stats[q]++)
>
> void ath9k_htc_err_stat_rx(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv,
> struct ath_rx_status *rs);
It seems that these macros (both the original and the new) aren't
following the guidance from the Coding Style which tells us under
"Things to avoid when using macros" that we should avoid "macros that
depend on having a local variable with a magic name". Wouldn't these
macros be "better" is they included the hif_dev/priv as arguments rather
than being "magic"?