From: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
The hardware command parser of txptctrl (TX protocol control) has overly
stringent timeout conditions, which results in false alarm. So disable it.
Signed-off-by: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h
index 72e448e91b6f..ccf74d9f9224 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/reg.h
@@ -1891,7 +1891,6 @@
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_USRCTL_NOINIT | \
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_CMDPSR_1STCMDERR | \
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_CMDPSR_CMDTYPE | \
- B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_CMDPSR_FRZTO | \
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_CMDPSR_TBLSZ | \
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_MPDUINFO_RECFG | \
B_AX_B0_IMR_ERR_MPDUIF_DATAERR | \
--
2.25.1
Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
> From: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
>
> The hardware command parser of txptctrl (TX protocol control) has overly
> stringent timeout conditions, which results in false alarm. So disable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
I'm in the To field, do you maybe want me to take this to wireless tree?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 07:12 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > From: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
> >
> > The hardware command parser of txptctrl (TX protocol control) has overly
> > stringent timeout conditions, which results in false alarm. So disable it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
>
> I'm in the To field, do you maybe want me to take this to wireless tree?
>
No, it should go via rtw.git. I just send this patch as usual.
Should I change to wireless mailing list as To field and no need to add you
in neither To field nor Cc field in the future?
Ping-Ke
Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 07:12 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > From: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > The hardware command parser of txptctrl (TX protocol control) has overly
>> > stringent timeout conditions, which results in false alarm. So disable it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
>>
>> I'm in the To field, do you maybe want me to take this to wireless tree?
>>
>
> No, it should go via rtw.git. I just send this patch as usual.
Ok.
> Should I change to wireless mailing list as To field and no need to
> add you in neither To field nor Cc field in the future?
Yes, please drop me from To and Cc fields. And if there's an important
fix you want to go to wireless tree please label it as "[PATCH
wireless]" (or comment on the patch) and assign to me on patchwork.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 08:01 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Should I change to wireless mailing list as To field and no need to
> > add you in neither To field nor Cc field in the future?
>
> Yes, please drop me from To and Cc fields. And if there's an important
> fix you want to go to wireless tree please label it as "[PATCH
> wireless]" (or comment on the patch) and assign to me on patchwork.
>
Got it. But, still add you to To-field for pull-request, right?
Ping-Ke
Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 08:01 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Should I change to wireless mailing list as To field and no need to
>> > add you in neither To field nor Cc field in the future?
>>
>> Yes, please drop me from To and Cc fields. And if there's an important
>> fix you want to go to wireless tree please label it as "[PATCH
>> wireless]" (or comment on the patch) and assign to me on patchwork.
>
> Got it. But, still add you to To-field for pull-request, right?
Actually no need even for that. I take all patches and pull requests
from patchwork anyway :)
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 08:18 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Actually no need even for that. I take all patches and pull requests
> from patchwork anyway :)
>
Got it :)
Ping-Ke
Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
>
> The hardware command parser of txptctrl (TX protocol control) has overly
> stringent timeout conditions, which results in false alarm. So disable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Yuan Li <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
1 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks.
209621a8f0cf wifi: rtw89: disable txptctrl IMR to avoid flase alarm
---
https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git