2022-02-18 11:33:09

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <[email protected]>
> >
> > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13.
> > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR.
> >
> > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag
> > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was
> > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active
> > scans on prohibited channels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J?r?me Pouiller <[email protected]>
>
> I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: J?r?me Pouiller <[email protected]>

Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by.

But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change?

thanks,

greg k-h


2022-02-18 11:37:09

by Jérôme Pouiller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation

On Friday 18 February 2022 12:00:54 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> > On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13.
> > > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR.
> > >
> > > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag
> > > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was
> > > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active
> > > scans on prohibited channels.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: J?r?me Pouiller <[email protected]>
> >
> > I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: J?r?me Pouiller <[email protected]>
>
> Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by.
>
> But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change?

The author hasn't used format-patch to transmit this patch.

Riccardo, can you reply to this mail with the mention "Signed-off-by:
Your name <[email protected]>"? It certifies that you wrote it or
otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch[1].


[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin

Thank you,

--
J?r?me Pouiller