2008-04-18 21:03:40

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [patch 6/7] mac80211: michael.c use unaligned/byteorder helpers

From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

Rather than open-coding the get/put of little endian values, use
get/put_unaligned and the byteorder helpers.

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
Cc: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

net/mac80211/michael.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff -puN net/mac80211/michael.c~mac80211-michaelc-use-unaligned-byteorder-helpers net/mac80211/michael.c
--- a/net/mac80211/michael.c~mac80211-michaelc-use-unaligned-byteorder-helpers
+++ a/net/mac80211/michael.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@

#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>

#include "michael.h"

@@ -24,21 +26,20 @@ static void michael_block(u32 *l, u32 *r
*l += *r;
}

-
-static inline u32 michael_get32(u8 *data)
+static u32 michael_get16(u8 *data)
{
- return data[0] | (data[1] << 8) | (data[2] << 16) | (data[3] << 24);
+ return le16_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le16 *)data));
}

-
-static inline void michael_put32(u32 val, u8 *data)
+static u32 michael_get32(u8 *data)
{
- data[0] = val & 0xff;
- data[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xff;
- data[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
- data[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xff;
+ return le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le32 *)data));
}

+static void michael_put32(u32 val, u8 *data)
+{
+ put_unaligned(cpu_to_le32(val), (__le32 *)data);
+}

void michael_mic(u8 *key, u8 *da, u8 *sa, u8 priority,
u8 *data, size_t data_len, u8 *mic)
@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ void michael_mic(u8 *key, u8 *da, u8 *sa
* calculation, but it is _not_ transmitted */
l ^= michael_get32(da);
michael_block(&l, &r);
- l ^= da[4] | (da[5] << 8) | (sa[0] << 16) | (sa[1] << 24);
+ l ^= michael_get16(da) | (michael_get16(sa) << 16);
michael_block(&l, &r);
l ^= michael_get32(&sa[2]);
michael_block(&l, &r);
_


2008-04-19 18:39:59

by Larry Finger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] mac80211: michael.c use unaligned/byteorder helpers

[email protected] wrote:
> From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
>
> Rather than open-coding the get/put of little endian values, use
> get/put_unaligned and the byteorder helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
> Cc: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> net/mac80211/michael.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN net/mac80211/michael.c~mac80211-michaelc-use-unaligned-byteorder-helpers net/mac80211/michael.c
> --- a/net/mac80211/michael.c~mac80211-michaelc-use-unaligned-byteorder-helpers
> +++ a/net/mac80211/michael.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>
> #include "michael.h"
>
> @@ -24,21 +26,20 @@ static void michael_block(u32 *l, u32 *r
> *l += *r;
> }
>
> -
> -static inline u32 michael_get32(u8 *data)
> +static u32 michael_get16(u8 *data)
> {
> - return data[0] | (data[1] << 8) | (data[2] << 16) | (data[3] << 24);
> + return le16_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le16 *)data));
> }
>
> -
> -static inline void michael_put32(u32 val, u8 *data)
> +static u32 michael_get32(u8 *data)
> {
> - data[0] = val & 0xff;
> - data[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xff;
> - data[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xff;
> - data[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xff;
> + return le32_to_cpu(get_unaligned((__le32 *)data));
> }
>
> +static void michael_put32(u32 val, u8 *data)
> +{
> + put_unaligned(cpu_to_le32(val), (__le32 *)data);
> +}
>
> void michael_mic(u8 *key, u8 *da, u8 *sa, u8 priority,
> u8 *data, size_t data_len, u8 *mic)
> @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ void michael_mic(u8 *key, u8 *da, u8 *sa
> * calculation, but it is _not_ transmitted */
> l ^= michael_get32(da);
> michael_block(&l, &r);
> - l ^= da[4] | (da[5] << 8) | (sa[0] << 16) | (sa[1] << 24);
> + l ^= michael_get16(da) | (michael_get16(sa) << 16);
___________________________^^

This should be da + 4! This change affects #7 of 7, and is needed
there as well. With those changes, my stuff works with patches 1-6 and
with 1-7.

Larry


2008-04-19 18:26:09

by Larry Finger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] mac80211: michael.c use unaligned/byteorder helpers

[email protected] wrote:
> From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
>
> Rather than open-coding the get/put of little endian values, use
> get/put_unaligned and the byteorder helpers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
> Cc: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> ---

The set of 7 patches break my system, which is x86_64 using WPA-PSK
TKIP. If I back out #6 and 7, then all is OK.

Does this series have any prerequisites? I'm running the current
wireless-testing git tree.

Larry

2008-04-20 02:26:22

by Larry Finger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] mac80211: michael.c use unaligned/byteorder helpers

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> Thanks for the testing, I posted an updated patchset on Thursday
> last week and this set has been dropped from -mm.
>
> The new patchset depends on the new unaligned helpers in -mm,
> if you want I can send you a full set if you feel like testing
> them.

I would be happy to test the full set.

Larry


2008-04-19 19:31:40

by Harvey Harrison

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] mac80211: michael.c use unaligned/byteorder helpers

On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 13:24 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> >
> > Rather than open-coding the get/put of little endian values, use
> > get/put_unaligned and the byteorder helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
> > Cc: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> The set of 7 patches break my system, which is x86_64 using WPA-PSK
> TKIP. If I back out #6 and 7, then all is OK.
>
> Does this series have any prerequisites? I'm running the current
> wireless-testing git tree.
>

Thanks for the testing, I posted an updated patchset on Thursday
last week and this set has been dropped from -mm.

The new patchset depends on the new unaligned helpers in -mm,
if you want I can send you a full set if you feel like testing
them.

Harvey