just to comply with current ath9k_hw_nvram_read to return value, hence
behaving reacting accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Abinader <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
index 5bd2cba..08607d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_eeprom.c
@@ -3252,7 +3252,8 @@ static int ar9300_eeprom_restore_flash(struct ath_hw *ah, u8 *mptr,
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mdata_size / 2; i++, data++)
- ath9k_hw_nvram_read(ah, i, data);
+ if (!ath9k_hw_nvram_read(ah, i, data))
+ return -EIO;
return 0;
}
@@ -3282,7 +3283,8 @@ static int ar9300_eeprom_restore_internal(struct ath_hw *ah,
if (ath9k_hw_use_flash(ah)) {
u8 txrx;
- ar9300_eeprom_restore_flash(ah, mptr, mdata_size);
+ if (ar9300_eeprom_restore_flash(ah, mptr, mdata_size))
+ return -EIO;
/* check if eeprom contains valid data */
eep = (struct ar9300_eeprom *) mptr;
--
2.5.0
Eduardo Abinader <[email protected]> wrote:
> just to comply with current ath9k_hw_nvram_read to return value, hence
> behaving reacting accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Abinader <[email protected]>
Thanks, 1 patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git:
a5d268277ad5 ath9k: consider return code on
--
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9249821/