Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
---
MAINTAINERS | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3148b71..2911648 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1170,11 +1170,10 @@ S: Supported
F: drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.*
ATMEL WIRELESS DRIVER
-M: Simon Kelley <[email protected]>
L: [email protected]
W: http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/atmel
W: http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net/
-S: Maintained
+S: Orphan
F: drivers/net/wireless/atmel*
AUDIT SUBSYSTEM
--
1.7.1.1
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:31 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Aww, how sad :(. I'll take it since I still have some of this
hardware. Not that I'll do much with it, but if the patches are simple
I'm happy to test+ack them.
Dan
> MAINTAINERS | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3148b71..2911648 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1170,11 +1170,10 @@ S: Supported
> F: drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.*
>
> ATMEL WIRELESS DRIVER
> -M: Simon Kelley <[email protected]>
> L: [email protected]
> W: http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/atmel
> W: http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net/
> -S: Maintained
> +S: Orphan
> F: drivers/net/wireless/atmel*
>
> AUDIT SUBSYSTEM
Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:31 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
>
> Aww, how sad :(. I'll take it since I still have some of this
> hardware. Not that I'll do much with it, but if the patches are simple
> I'm happy to test+ack them.
>
Thanks Dan, whilst I still have the hardware, I no longer have a
convenient PCMCIA slot into which to plug it.
This hardware is well orphaned: it never made is past 802.11b, and there
have been no new models for a long time. Nevertheless, if the existing
code can be kept functional, that would be good.
Cheers,
Simon.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:07:35AM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:31 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> >
> > Aww, how sad :(. I'll take it since I still have some of this
> > hardware. Not that I'll do much with it, but if the patches are simple
> > I'm happy to test+ack them.
> >
> Thanks Dan, whilst I still have the hardware, I no longer have a
> convenient PCMCIA slot into which to plug it.
>
> This hardware is well orphaned: it never made is past 802.11b, and there
> have been no new models for a long time. Nevertheless, if the existing
> code can be kept functional, that would be good.
Is the existing code functional? The device I have seems to only
half work -- I suppose I need to figure that out...
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.
John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:07:35AM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:31 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
>>> Aww, how sad :(. I'll take it since I still have some of this
>>> hardware. Not that I'll do much with it, but if the patches are simple
>>> I'm happy to test+ack them.
>>>
>> Thanks Dan, whilst I still have the hardware, I no longer have a
>> convenient PCMCIA slot into which to plug it.
>>
>> This hardware is well orphaned: it never made is past 802.11b, and there
>> have been no new models for a long time. Nevertheless, if the existing
>> code can be kept functional, that would be good.
>
> Is the existing code functional? The device I have seems to only
> half work -- I suppose I need to figure that out...
>
> John
I'm not aware of any problems. I'll try and test a new kernel when I can
find a PCMCIA-full laptop. If the problem turns out to be your hardware,
John, I can send you another card.
Cheers,
Simon.