On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:46:16PM -0800, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> Thanks for your work on compat-wireless, you are officially awesome :)
> I just noticed that recent changes in the b43 driver have renamed
> CONFIG_B43_NPHY to CONFIG_B43_PHY_N, but config.mk in
> compat-wireless-2.6 is still using the old config option name. Thought
> I should let you know.
CONFIG_B43_NPHY is still used, and we have CONFIG_B43_PHY_LP=y as well.
I don't see any CONFIG_B43_PHY_N on upstream.
Luis
On 12/13/2010 11:43 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:46:16PM -0800, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> Thanks for your work on compat-wireless, you are officially awesome :)
>> I just noticed that recent changes in the b43 driver have renamed
>> CONFIG_B43_NPHY to CONFIG_B43_PHY_N, but config.mk in
>> compat-wireless-2.6 is still using the old config option name. Thought
>> I should let you know.
>
> CONFIG_B43_NPHY is still used, and we have CONFIG_B43_PHY_LP=y as well.
> I don't see any CONFIG_B43_PHY_N on upstream.
It is in wireless-testing since commit 692d2c0fb36c02ad07d54641c26f48e644b27fbd,
dated December 7.
Larry
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Larry Finger
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 11:43 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:46:16PM -0800, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your work on compat-wireless, you are officially awesome :)
>>> I just noticed that recent changes in the b43 driver have renamed
>>> CONFIG_B43_NPHY to CONFIG_B43_PHY_N, but config.mk in
>>> compat-wireless-2.6 is still using the old config option name. Thought
>>> I should let you know.
>>
>> CONFIG_B43_NPHY is still used, and we have CONFIG_B43_PHY_LP=y as well.
>> I don't see any CONFIG_B43_PHY_N on upstream.
>
> It is in wireless-testing since commit 692d2c0fb36c02ad07d54641c26f48e644b27fbd,
> dated December 7.
Anyone care to send me a respective patch for compat-wireless?
Luis