Hi,
Under Windows, you can achieve 10-15MiB/s..
Under Linux, even with 150mbps USB wireless adapters, the max never
appears to go above > 3-4MiB/s, to work around this, order more
USB-wifi ticks and run them in parallel far away from each other with USB
extenders:
box1:
-------------
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=39 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
box2:
-------------
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
But I was curious if anyone had achieved > 10 MiB/s with any wireless
adapter with Linux?
Also, those native Linux USB adapters (carl) work good, so far.
With the patch provided earlier for the rt2800usb driver, it is no longer
crashing under 3.0 so I put two of them on a single box plus a carl based
one, now I get better I/O, e.g. 4MiB/s x 6 = 24MiB/s.
Justin.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:53:51PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Under Windows, you can achieve 10-15MiB/s..
>
> Under Linux, even with 150mbps USB wireless adapters, the max never
> appears to go above > 3-4MiB/s, to work around this, order more
> USB-wifi ticks and run them in parallel far away from each other
> with USB
> extenders:
>
> box1:
> -------------
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=39 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>
> box2:
> -------------
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>
> But I was curious if anyone had achieved > 10 MiB/s with any
> wireless adapter with Linux?
Well, if your AP which you are connected from Windows host
has linux based firmware (what is most probable), then linux
is capable to transfer also at 10-15 MiB/s :-)
But yes, I never achieved more than 10MB/s on linux station.
Best results I have is about 7.5MB/s on 2.4 GHz networks and
10MB/s on 5GHz .
Stanislaw
Larry Finger schrieb:
> On 08/03/2011 02:53 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Under Windows, you can achieve 10-15MiB/s..
>>
>> Under Linux, even with 150mbps USB wireless adapters, the max never
>> appears to
>> go above > 3-4MiB/s, to work around this, order more USB-wifi ticks
>> and run them
>> in parallel far away from each other with USB
>> extenders:
>>
>> box1:
>> -------------
>> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=39 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>>
>> box2:
>> -------------
>> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
>> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>>
>> But I was curious if anyone had achieved > 10 MiB/s with any wireless
>> adapter
>> with Linux?
>>
>> Also, those native Linux USB adapters (carl) work good, so far.
>> With the patch provided earlier for the rt2800usb driver, it is no longer
>> crashing under 3.0 so I put two of them on a single box plus a carl
>> based one,
>> now I get better I/O, e.g. 4MiB/s x 6 = 24MiB/s.
>
> On a 150 Mbps connection running the following script
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> dest="sonylap" # set the servername
>
> while true ; do
> netperf -t TCP_MAERTS -H $dest
> netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H $dest
> netperf -t TCP_SENDFILE -H $dest
> done
>
> I get the following for a D-Link DWA-130 containing a Realtek RTL8192SU
> with driver r8712u:
>
> finger@larrylap:~/bcm_git/vendor-driver/5.10.56.46> ~/netperf.sh
> TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap
> (192.168.1.50) port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.04 53.52
> TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap
> (192.168.1.50) port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.03 55.58
> TCP SENDFILE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap
> (192.168.1.50) port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.06 65.26
>
> I claim that 50-65 Mbps is pretty good.
This means about half of fast ethernet (5-6,5 MB/s). It's too
insufficient for 802.11n / 40 MHz.
rt3572sta (Linksys WUSB600N v2) against rt2860 based AP (rt2800pci) -
from one room to another:
Do 4. Aug 18:48:27 CEST 2011
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.07 82.51
TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.02 128.94
TCP SENDFILE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.09 77.47
rt2800usb doesn't work at all with WUSB600N v2.
ar9285 (ath9k) against rt2860 based AP (rt2800pci) - through reinforced
concrete floor:
Do 4. Aug 19:03:04 CEST 2011
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.10 80.23
TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.06 80.82
TCP SENDFILE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to srv (1.1.1.1)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.10 78.51
-> there is room for optimization! I don't think, that the rt3572sta is
the best solution absolutely seen :-). Unfortunately, I don't have a
windows machine to compare ... . Maybe, I could get one to test ... .
Andreas
On 08/03/2011 02:53 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Under Windows, you can achieve 10-15MiB/s..
>
> Under Linux, even with 150mbps USB wireless adapters, the max never appears to
> go above > 3-4MiB/s, to work around this, order more USB-wifi ticks and run them
> in parallel far away from each other with USB
> extenders:
>
> box1:
> -------------
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=54 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=39 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>
> box2:
> -------------
> wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=58.5 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan1 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
> wlan2 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:"hidden"
> Bit Rate=52 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
>
> But I was curious if anyone had achieved > 10 MiB/s with any wireless adapter
> with Linux?
>
> Also, those native Linux USB adapters (carl) work good, so far.
> With the patch provided earlier for the rt2800usb driver, it is no longer
> crashing under 3.0 so I put two of them on a single box plus a carl based one,
> now I get better I/O, e.g. 4MiB/s x 6 = 24MiB/s.
On a 150 Mbps connection running the following script
#!/bin/sh
dest="sonylap" # set the servername
while true ; do
netperf -t TCP_MAERTS -H $dest
netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H $dest
netperf -t TCP_SENDFILE -H $dest
done
I get the following for a D-Link DWA-130 containing a Realtek RTL8192SU with
driver r8712u:
finger@larrylap:~/bcm_git/vendor-driver/5.10.56.46> ~/netperf.sh
TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap (192.168.1.50)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.04 53.52
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap (192.168.1.50)
port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.03 55.58
TCP SENDFILE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to sonylap
(192.168.1.50) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.06 65.26
I claim that 50-65 Mbps is pretty good.
We get better than 10 Mbps with lots of different adapters.
Larry