2011-10-07 18:57:08

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: moving GIT back to kernel.org...


I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
I will be solely updating those trees again.

I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.

Just a heads up for everyone...


2011-10-07 23:10:40

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

Hi Dave,

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:46:57 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:42:12 +1100
>
> > On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
> >
> > You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
> > "current release fixes" trees) ...
>
> I've made a dummy sparc-next tree for you to pull from, thanks:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next.git
>
> As for ide, I only plan to accept real bug fixes for that subsystem
> so I'll avoid creating an ide-next tree for now.

OK, I will use those trees from now on.

Also, I have decided to rename them in linux-next to match your names, so:

Was Now
--- ---
net-current net
net net-next
sparc-current sparc
sparc sparc-next
ide-curent ide

and I have dropped the old ide (would be ide-next) tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.14 kB)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2011-10-08 07:09:26

by Yinglin Sun

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 11:55 PM, Yinglin Sun wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From: David Miller <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
>>>
>>>> I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
>>>> I will be solely updating those trees again.
>>>>
>>>> I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.
>>>>
>>>> Just a heads up for everyone...
>>> Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
>>>
>> I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
>> So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
>> About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Yinglin
>>
>
> *If* you have change against the network core/drivers then, you would
> want to use David Miller's net or net-next trees.
>
> As a general rule:
>  - net tree is only for fixes/critical fixes
>  - net-next tree is for everything else
>
> There are always exceptions, but if you stick to the above general rule,
> you will be fine.
>
>

Got it. Thanks Jeff!

Yinglin

2011-10-07 22:49:04

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:42:12 +1100

> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
>
> You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
> "current release fixes" trees) ...

I've made a dummy sparc-next tree for you to pull from, thanks:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc-next.git

As for ide, I only plan to accept real bug fixes for that subsystem
so I'll avoid creating an ide-next tree for now.

2011-10-07 20:01:10

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

From: David Miller <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)

>
> I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
> I will be solely updating those trees again.
>
> I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.
>
> Just a heads up for everyone...

Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git

Thanks.

2011-10-08 07:01:37

by Jeff Kirsher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

On 10/07/2011 11:55 PM, Yinglin Sun wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: David Miller <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>> I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
>>> I will be solely updating those trees again.
>>>
>>> I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.
>>>
>>> Just a heads up for everyone...
>> Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
>>
> I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
> So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
> About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yinglin
>

*If* you have change against the network core/drivers then, you would
want to use David Miller's net or net-next trees.

As a general rule:
- net tree is only for fixes/critical fixes
- net-next tree is for everything else

There are always exceptions, but if you stick to the above general rule,
you will be fine.


Attachments:
signature.asc (900.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2011-10-07 22:42:20

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

Hi Dave,

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:59:02 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git

I have switched to these.

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git

You used to have sparc-next and ide-next (and the above used to be your
"current release fixes" trees) ...

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


Attachments:
(No filename) (645.00 B)
(No filename) (836.00 B)
Download all attachments

2011-10-08 06:55:34

by Yinglin Sun

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: moving GIT back to kernel.org...

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:59 PM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: David Miller <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>
>> I'm about to setup my GIT trees on kernel.org, once that is complete
>> I will be solely updating those trees again.
>>
>> I will notify everyone when this is ready to go.
>>
>> Just a heads up for everyone...
>
> Ok, they are now online, please update your URLs.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/sparc.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/ide.git
>

I'm still new to net kernel development, so a little confused about these trees.
So we should submit patches based on these trees, instead of Linus'?
About net and net-next, How to decide which one to use?

Thanks!

Yinglin