As regulatory events are processed even before the wiphy is registered,
calling regulatory_hint() at early stage should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c | 4 ++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
index e82f220..af3d0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/cfg80211.c
@@ -3021,12 +3021,16 @@ int ath6kl_cfg80211_init(struct ath6kl *ar)
return ret;
}
+ ar->wiphy_registered = true;
+
return 0;
}
void ath6kl_cfg80211_cleanup(struct ath6kl *ar)
{
wiphy_unregister(ar->wiphy);
+
+ ar->wiphy_registered = false;
}
struct ath6kl *ath6kl_cfg80211_create(void)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h
index 8d8677d..cb5ddda 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h
@@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ struct ath6kl {
bool p2p;
+ bool wiphy_registered;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ATH6KL_DEBUG
struct {
struct sk_buff_head fwlog_queue;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.c
index 0527933..97680a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/wmi.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void ath6kl_wmi_regdomain_event(struct wmi *wmi, u8 *datap, int len)
regpair->regDmnEnum);
}
- if (country) {
+ if (country && wmi->parent_dev->wiphy_registered) {
alpha2[0] = country->isoName[0];
alpha2[1] = country->isoName[1];
--
1.7.0.4
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:23:52AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> On 02/25/2012 11:13 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> > As regulatory events are processed even before the wiphy is registered,
> > calling regulatory_hint() at early stage should be fixed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <[email protected]>
>
> I take it that this depeneds on your netdev init rework patchset you
> sent earlier, so I don't take this quite yet. Please correct me if I
> misunderstood.
Yeah, this patch depends on my recent 5 patch series. I'll address the comments
in that patch series.
Vasanth
On 02/25/2012 11:13 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> As regulatory events are processed even before the wiphy is registered,
> calling regulatory_hint() at early stage should be fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <[email protected]>
I take it that this depeneds on your netdev init rework patchset you
sent earlier, so I don't take this quite yet. Please correct me if I
misunderstood.
Kalle
On 02/25/2012 11:13 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> As regulatory events are processed even before the wiphy is registered,
> calling regulatory_hint() at early stage should be fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <[email protected]>
Thanks, applied.
Kalle